Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0%
Desktop 0%
Workstation 0%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive172% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemAsus TUF GAMING FX504GD_FX80GD  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX504GD
Memory10.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180412
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateDec 29 '18 at 02:11
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i5-8300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
70.4% Very good
Memory 87.7
1-Core 115
2-Core 194
79% 132 Pts
4-Core 294
8-Core 383
44% 339 Pts
64-Core 384
26% 384 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 70.4%
Great: 86%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$99
207GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXE7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1229 310 310 311 311 311 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
172% Outstanding
Read 865
Write 1,452
Mixed 781
SusWrite 464
201% 890 MB/s
4K Read 48.6
4K Write 126
4K Mixed 61.2
218% 78.4 MB/s
DQ Read 964
DQ Write 933
DQ Mixed 992
733% 963 MB/s
Poor: 147%
This bench: 172%
Great: 275%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 1TB-$104
927GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 119 120 126 128 127 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
73.9% Very good
Read 132
Write 8.3
Mixed 67.9
SusWrite 124
61% 83 MB/s
4K Read 3.2
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 2.1
446% 3.2 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Kingston 9905624-043.A00G Hynix HMA851S6CJR6N-VK 12GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
67.8% Good
MC Read 27.1
MC Write 23
MC Mixed 20.4
67% 23.5 GB/s
SC Read 17
SC Write 26.9
SC Mixed 22.4
63% 22.1 GB/s
Latency 69.8
57% 69.8 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 68%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical TUF GAMING FX504GD_FX80GD Builds (Compare 4,084 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus TUF GAMING FX504GD_FX80GD

The Best.
Intel Core i5-11400F $220Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11600K $259Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-11700K $380Nvidia RTX 3080 $700Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $92SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback