MSI Z97 GAMING 3 (MS-7918)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive124% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory28GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 28GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemMSI MS-7918
MotherboardMSI Z97 GAMING 3 (MS-7918)  (all builds)
Memory23 GB free of 28 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160216
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 27 '18 at 22:28
Run Duration853 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4690K-$50
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
68.5% Good
Memory 83.9
1-Core 104
2-Core 188
73% 125 Pts
4-Core 298
8-Core 364
43% 331 Pts
64-Core 387
24% 387 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 68.5%
Great: 82%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba OCZ RD400 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$70
296GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 57CZ Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 361 352 345 354 369 358 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
124% Outstanding
Read 1,003
Write 720
Mixed 748
SusWrite 356
158% 707 MB/s
4K Read 26.7
4K Write 100
4K Mixed 45
151% 57.3 MB/s
DQ Read 471
DQ Write 196
DQ Mixed 320
241% 329 MB/s
Poor: 116%
This bench: 124%
Great: 242%
Toshiba THNSNK512GCS8 SATA 512GB
380GB free
Firmware: K8DC4101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 120 122 125 128 130 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
71.1% Very good
Read 365
Write 293
Mixed 210
SusWrite 125
55% 248 MB/s
4K Read 20.2
4K Write 83.6
4K Mixed 29.7
113% 44.5 MB/s
DQ Read 358
DQ Write 285
DQ Mixed 183
175% 275 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 71.1%
Great: 89%
OCZ Trion 150 480GB-$300
402GB free
Firmware: SAFZ12.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 122 124 127 130 113 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
77.1% Very good
Read 415
Write 391
Mixed 346
SusWrite 124
72% 319 MB/s
4K Read 25.9
4K Write 77.7
4K Mixed 33
123% 45.5 MB/s
DQ Read 344
DQ Write 339
DQ Mixed 194
186% 292 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 77.1%
Great: 101%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$105
232GB free
Firmware: 1B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 311 291 293 302 302 292 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
140% Outstanding
Read 651
Write 577
Mixed 540
SusWrite 299
116% 517 MB/s
4K Read 46.6
4K Write 98.6
4K Mixed 62.9
203% 69.4 MB/s
DQ Read 780
DQ Write 662
DQ Mixed 903
627% 781 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 140%
Great: 280%
WD Blue 1TB (2010)-$70
639GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 100 100 103 104 104 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
64.5% Good
Read 122
Write 113
Mixed 74
SusWrite 102
76% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
178% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 64.5%
Great: 74%
WD Blue 1TB (2010)-$70
730GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 100 101 104 106 104 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
54.7% Above average
Read 87.8
Write 91
Mixed 65.2
SusWrite 103
64% 86.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.8
161% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 74%
Hitachi HTS545050A7E680 500GB
464GB free
Firmware: 8101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 100 101 103 102 102 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
59.9% Above average
Read 108
Write 100
Mixed 39.5
SusWrite 101
63% 87.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
104% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX2400C11D3/8GX 0215 CMY16GX3M2A2400C11 D3ES12081XH12AA KHX2400C11D3/8GX 28GB
2400, 1600, 1600, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
50.3% Above average
MC Read 17
MC Write 18.9
MC Mixed 15.9
49% 17.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 17.3
SC Mixed 15.6
44% 15.4 GB/s
Latency 73.7
54% 73.7 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 50.3%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z97 GAMING 3 (MS-7918) Builds (Compare 2,603 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: MSI Z97 GAMING 3 (MS-7918) - $135

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $783
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback