Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 5 WIFI

Performance Results


Gaming 91% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 93% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 91% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	96.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	212% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 5 WIFI
Motherboard	Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 5 WIFI (all builds)
Memory	11 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180314
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	Dec 27 '18 at 21:19
Run Duration	139 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	11%

PC Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$210 159,077 User benchmarks, average bench 76% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	88.4% Excellent	Memory 82.7 1-Core 133 2-Core 256 87% 157 Pts	4-Core 504 8-Core 912 85% 708 Pts	64-Core 1,379 85% 1,379 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 88.4% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX Vega-64-$400 91,676 User benchmarks, average bench 87% AMD(1002 6B76) CLim: 1630 MHz, MLim: 945 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 18.12.3 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	96.7% Outstanding	Lighting 118 Reflection 92.3 Parallax 185 96% 132 fps	MRender 90 Gravity 130 Splatting 131 98% 117 fps
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 96.7% Great: 94%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 381,216 User benchmarks, average bench 273% 227GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 824 642 653 659 655 628 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	212% Outstanding	Read 1306 Write 1,159 Mixed 1,084 SusWrite 677 237% 1,057 MB/s	4K Read 52 4K Write 132 4K Mixed 63.9 231% 82.7 MB/s	DQ Read 1,139 DQ Write 1,005 DQ Mixed 1054 795% 1,066 MB/s
Poor: 199% ↑ This bench: 212% Great: 340%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$51 462,780 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 2TB free Firmware: CC26 SusWrite @10s intervals: 192 192 193 194 191 192 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	107% Outstanding	Read 181 Write 139 Mixed 88.7 SusWrite 193 110% 150 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 114%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 16GB-$6 19,339 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 11GB free, PID 5581 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.1 11 12 12 11 12 MB/s Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	29.2% Poor	Read 119 Write 9.9 Mixed 24 SusWrite 10.5 37% 40.9 MB/s	4K Read 5.8 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 3.8 243% 4.1 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 29.2% Great: 35%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 3000 C16 Series 2x8GB 16,105 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	99.6% Outstanding	MC Read 40.8 MC Write 36.2 MC Mixed 31 103% 36 GB/s	SC Read 25.1 SC Write 37.8 SC Mixed 28.4 87% 30.4 GB/s	Latency 75.7 53% 75.7 ns
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 99.6% Great: 100%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X470 AORUS GAMING 5 WIFI-CF Builds (Compare 858 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 83%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 81%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 5 WIFI - $475

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	268x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $155Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	87x
Ryzen 5 2600XAMD $120Bench 74%, 142,983 samples	80x

GPU
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	60x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	44x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	44x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	39x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	38x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $98Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	35x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	38x
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	37x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	33x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 106% - Outstanding

Total price: $976

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 5 WIFI

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 5 WIFI - $475

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)