HP 15 Notebook PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.59% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive47.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Run History
5 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemHP 15 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2212
Memory13.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20160726
Uptime12.3 Days
Run DateDec 27 '18 at 14:14
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4005U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 1.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
47.4% Average
Memory 73.5
1-Core 47.4
2-Core 73.2
44% 64.7 Pts
4-Core 125
8-Core 132
17% 129 Pts
64-Core 130
8% 130 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 47.4%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)
HP(103C 2212) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.3960
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
3.59% Terrible
Lighting 4
Reflection 6.85
Parallax 5.38
3% 5.41 fps
MRender 6.67
Gravity 1.93
Splatting 6.52
4% 5.04 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.59%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36
12GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 60AABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 63 64 63 63 63 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
47.5% Average
Read 255
Write 116
Mixed 160
SusWrite 66.2
33% 149 MB/s
4K Read 21
4K Write 46.5
4K Mixed 27.1
91% 31.5 MB/s
DQ Read 93.4
DQ Write 123
DQ Mixed 102
78% 106 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 47.5%
Great: 73%
Hitachi HTS545050A7E680 500GB
26GB free
Firmware: GR2OA350
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 66 68 68 67 68 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
36.3% Below average
Read 60
Write 54.8
Mixed 24
SusWrite 66.3
37% 51.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
100% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 36.3%
Great: 58%
UFD 2.0 Silicon-Power16G 16GB
9GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.4 7.8 8.3 8.9 8.8 8.4 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
6.95% Terrible
Read 27.8
Write 1.5
Mixed 9.7
SusWrite 8.1
12% 11.8 MB/s
4K Read 4.9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
18% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.95%
Great: 11%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT102464BF160B.M16 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
45.4% Average
MC Read 15.8
MC Write 17.7
MC Mixed 16.3
47% 16.6 GB/s
SC Read 9.5
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 12.1
29% 10.1 GB/s
Latency 93.4
43% 93.4 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 45.4%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 15 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 3,239 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP 15 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback