Asrock Q1900M

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 32% Sail boat	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.84% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock Q1900M (all builds)
Memory	3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20141031
Uptime	2.3 Days
Run Date	Dec 26 '18 at 18:18
Run Duration	172 Seconds
Run User	HKG-User
Background CPU	16%

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron J1900 6,116 User benchmarks, average bench 34% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2 GHz Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	38.3% Below average	Memory 62.3 1-Core 22.8 2-Core 45 31% 43.4 Pts	4-Core 86 8-Core 83.6 11% 84.8 Pts	64-Core 79.2 5% 79.2 Pts
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 38.3% Great: 40%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz) 90,156 User benchmarks, average bench 1% ASRock(1849 0F31) 2.2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4276 Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	0.84% Terrible	Lighting 0.9 Reflection 1.08 Parallax 1 1% 0.99 fps	MRender 1.48 Gravity 0.83 Splatting 1.43 1% 1.25 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.84% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate Desktop SSHD 2TB-$45 94,145 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 196GB free (System drive) Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 156 166 150 183 185 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	87.5% Excellent	Read 139 Write 194 Mixed 53.8 SusWrite 165 100% 138 MB/s	4K Read 1.6 4K Write 4.3 4K Mixed 2.4 413% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 87.5% Great: 108%
Seagate ST3320613AS 320GB-$30 12,971 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 24GB free Firmware: CCF2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 95 83 88 93 88 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	46.4% Average	Read 73.3 Write 70.3 Mixed 39.5 SusWrite 88.4 50% 67.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.8 130% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 46.4% Great: 65%
TOSHIBA MQ01ABD100 1TB 1,122 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 130GB free, PID 0237 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 14 14 13 14 14 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	11.7% Very poor	Read 30 Write 20.8 Mixed 18 SusWrite 13.5 26% 20.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.6 70% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 11.7% Great: 43%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB 1,841 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 7TB free, PID ab38 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 13 14 13 14 14 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	17.6% Very poor	Read 25.3 Write 23.3 Mixed 22 SusWrite 13.4 28% 21 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 3.5 4K Mixed 0.8 151% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 17.6% Great: 75%
Seagate Backup+ RD 1TB 103 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 87GB free, PID a003 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 14 14 13 14 14 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	12.7% Very poor	Read 30.5 Write 23.8 Mixed 24.2 SusWrite 13.5 30% 23 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.9 90% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 12.7% Great: 41%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Team Team-Elite-1600 1x8GB 3,120 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	20.4% Poor	MC Read 7.4 MC Write 7.2 MC Mixed 6.9 20% 7.17 GB/s	SC Read 2.4 SC Write 4.7 SC Mixed 4.4 11% 3.83 GB/s	Latency 121 33% 121 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 20.4% Great: 34%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Q1900M Builds (Compare 201 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 32%

Sail boat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock Q1900M

CPU
Celeron J1900IntelBench 34%, 6,116 samples	191x
Celeron J1900IntelBench 36%, 507 samples	10x

GPU
HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 90,156 samples	131x
R7 240AMDBench 5%, 58,337 samples	8x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	8x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	12x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	4x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	4x

RAM
TEAMGROUP-UD3-1600 1x8GBUnknownBench 27%, 3,584 samples	19x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	10x
TEAMGROUP-UD3-1600 2x8GBUnknownBench 52%, 6,864 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 22% - Poor

Total price: $28

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16