bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.
SystemVMware, VMware Virtual Platform
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory0.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8
BIOS Date20140414
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateDec 26 '18 at 09:14
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2650 0
CPU socket #0, 4 CPU, 16 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
30.9% Below average
Memory 35.9
1-Core 29.3
2-Core 67.9
26% 44.4 Pts
4-Core 139
8-Core 298
26% 219 Pts
64-Core 348
22% 348 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 30.9%
Great: 59%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware Virtual disk 193GB
75GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 15 19 15 33 45 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
12.5% Very poor
Read 18.4
Write 14.2
Mixed 32.3
SusWrite 24.8
17% 22.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 1.5
199% 1 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.5%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x16GB
1 of 64 slots used
16GB DIMM DRAM
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
56.1% Above average
MC Read 27.8
MC Write 19.4
MC Mixed 24.1
68% 23.8 GB/s
SC Read 5.3
SC Write 2.2
SC Mixed 0.4
8% 2.63 GB/s
Latency 222
18% 222 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,473 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback