Acer Predator G3-571

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (0th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 100 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 13.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot Drive20.5% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (93%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAcer Predator G3-571  (all builds)
MotherboardKBL Sienta_KLS
Memory9.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181102
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 24 '18 at 13:24
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 93%

 PC Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
13.8% Very poor
Memory 20.1
1-Core 11.2
2-Core 24
12% 18.4 Pts
4-Core 42.5
8-Core 53.7
6% 48.1 Pts
64-Core 93
6% 93 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 13.8%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile)
Acer(1025 118B) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 25.21.14.1735
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 16.6
41% 16.6 fps
Poor: 35% Great: 52%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFS256G39TND-N210A 256GB
76GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 30001P10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 140 150 126 126 113 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
20.5% Poor
Read 130
Write 121
Mixed 102
SusWrite 126
27% 120 MB/s
4K Read 3.6
4K Write 8.3
4K Mixed 6.1
18% 6 MB/s
DQ Read 49.9
DQ Write 37.9
DQ Mixed 48.2
35% 45.3 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 20.5%
Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR26D4S9S8MH-8 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Relative performance (0th percentile)
26.8% Poor
MC Read 8
MC Write 11.3
MC Mixed 11.9
30% 10.4 GB/s
SC Read 3.5
SC Write 5.8
SC Mixed 6
15% 5.1 GB/s
Latency 320
12% 320 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 26.8%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Predator G3-571 Builds (Compare 1,572 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft

System: Acer Predator G3-571

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback