MSI Z97 GAMING 3 (MS-7918)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive134% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory28GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 28GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (61%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMSI MS-7918
MotherboardMSI Z97 GAMING 3 (MS-7918)  (all builds)
Memory22.5 GB free of 28 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160216
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 21 '18 at 23:50
Run Duration278 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU 61%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4690K-$50
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
68.4% Good
Memory 81.7
1-Core 86.1
2-Core 193
69% 120 Pts
4-Core 310
8-Core 369
44% 340 Pts
64-Core 382
24% 382 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 68.4%
Great: 82%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$104
52GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 348 161 154 152 150 149 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
134% Outstanding
Read 692
Write 454
Mixed 563
SusWrite 186
106% 473 MB/s
4K Read 52.1
4K Write 93.6
4K Mixed 60.9
206% 68.9 MB/s
DQ Read 778
DQ Write 630
DQ Mixed 828
586% 746 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 134%
Great: 280%
Toshiba THNSNK512GCS8 SATA 512GB
382GB free
Firmware: K8DC4101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 267 329 350 340 344 349 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
86.4% Excellent
Read 371
Write 329
Mixed 221
SusWrite 330
70% 313 MB/s
4K Read 21.7
4K Write 83
4K Mixed 33.1
119% 45.9 MB/s
DQ Read 363
DQ Write 297
DQ Mixed 183
177% 281 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 86.4%
Great: 89%
OCZ Trion 150 480GB-$300
402GB free
Firmware: SAFZ12.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 280 352 157 282 285 293 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
90.7% Outstanding
Read 474
Write 450
Mixed 346
SusWrite 275
87% 386 MB/s
4K Read 27.3
4K Write 74.8
4K Mixed 36.8
128% 46.3 MB/s
DQ Read 347
DQ Write 339
DQ Mixed 192
186% 292 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 90.7%
Great: 101%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$104
233GB free
Firmware: 1B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1004 541 305 303 303 304 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
181% Outstanding
Read 1,213
Write 1,078
Mixed 1,005
SusWrite 460
210% 939 MB/s
4K Read 50.2
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 64.7
218% 75.3 MB/s
DQ Read 957
DQ Write 690
DQ Mixed 934
668% 861 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 181%
Great: 280%
WD Blue 1TB (2010)-$70
640GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 112 111 111 114 114 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
63.9% Good
Read 110
Write 104
Mixed 71.6
SusWrite 112
73% 99.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
187% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 74%
WD Blue 1TB (2010)-$70
730GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 113 112 113 115 115 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
59.3% Above average
Read 93
Write 87.9
Mixed 66.2
SusWrite 114
66% 90.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
153% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 59.3%
Great: 74%
Hitachi HTS545050A7E680 500GB
463GB free
Firmware: 8101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 101 102 104 104 103 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
59.6% Above average
Read 105
Write 103
Mixed 39.8
SusWrite 103
64% 87.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.5
102% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX2400C11D3/8GX 0215 CMY16GX3M2A2400C11 D3ES12081XH12AA KHX2400C11D3/8GX 28GB
2400, 1600, 1600, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
51.3% Above average
MC Read 18.2
MC Write 19.1
MC Mixed 16
51% 17.8 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 15.5
44% 15.5 GB/s
Latency 77.4
52% 77.4 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z97 GAMING 3 (MS-7918) Builds (Compare 2,603 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: MSI Z97 GAMING 3 (MS-7918) - $135

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $783
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback