Asus X756UV

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 15%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 13.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics4.22% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus X756UV  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X756UV
Memory1 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.1 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160919
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateDec 21 '18 at 20:40
Run Duration270 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-6100U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
13.9% Very poor
Memory 20
1-Core 15.9
2-Core 26.8
13% 20.9 Pts
4-Core 45
8-Core 52.6
6% 48.8 Pts
64-Core 65.1
4% 65.1 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 13.9%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)
Asus(1043 114E) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 21.20.16.4550
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
4.22% Terrible
Lighting 5.27
Reflection 8.19
Parallax 4.62
4% 6.03 fps
MRender 2.48
Gravity 4.33
Splatting 7.09
4% 4.63 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.22%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ01ABF050 500GB-$32
141GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AM0B3J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 10 10 9.8 11 11 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
18.8% Very poor
Read 55.2
Write 44.9
Mixed 24.7
SusWrite 10.4
25% 33.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.2
40% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 18.8%
Great: 60%
Виртуальный диск (Майкрософт) 43GB
11GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 9.6 10 10 10 9.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
20% Poor
Read 58
Write 69.2
Mixed 26
SusWrite 11.5
30% 41.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.3
70% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 20%
Great: 79%
Виртуальный диск (Майкрософт) 61GB
9GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.1 9.7 11 9.7 11 17 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
14% Very poor
Read 37.5
Write 69
Mixed 17.5
SusWrite 11.1
25% 33.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.5
87% 0.6 MB/s
Виртуальный диск (Майкрософт) 16GB
0GB free
Firmware: 1.0
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 39.5
Write 39.2
Mixed 20.2
24% 33 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.4
76% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 22% Great: 75%
Виртуальный диск (Майкрософт) 32GB
1GB free
Firmware: 1.0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 79
Write 81.5
Mixed 25.2
45% 61.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.3
53% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 22% Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA851S6AFR6N-UH 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
14.8% Very poor
MC Read 6
MC Write 6.6
MC Mixed 5
17% 5.87 GB/s
SC Read 0.6
SC Write 3
SC Mixed 0.6
4% 1.4 GB/s
Latency 321
12% 321 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 14.8%
Great: 39%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X756UV Builds (Compare 62 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus X756UV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback