Sony SVE1713R1EB

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 66%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics95.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive98.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemSony SVE1713R1EB  (all builds)
MotherboardSony VAIO
Memory14 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben, 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121113
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 20 '18 at 22:59
Run Duration179 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3840QM-$549
N/A, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
67.6% Good
Memory 84.7
1-Core 98.1
2-Core 187
72% 123 Pts
4-Core 273
8-Core 456
44% 365 Pts
64-Core 458
28% 458 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 67.6%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
Sony(104D 90AC) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 368.81
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
95.3% Outstanding
Lighting 122
Reflection 141
Parallax 131
99% 131 fps
MRender 103
Gravity 132
Splatting 92.3
88% 109 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 95.3%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$110
358GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 410 438 446 447 446 447 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
98.5% Outstanding
Read 447
Write 434
Mixed 392
SusWrite 439
96% 428 MB/s
4K Read 29.2
4K Write 52.1
4K Mixed 37.5
120% 39.6 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 345
DQ Mixed 364
274% 365 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 98.5%
Great: 133%
Samsung 840 250GB-$251
161GB free
Firmware: DXT0AB0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 223 234 237 239 238 239 MB/s
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
56.4% Above average
Read 239
Write 231
Mixed 149
SusWrite 235
48% 213 MB/s
4K Read 21.1
4K Write 40
4K Mixed 19.6
78% 26.9 MB/s
DQ Read 200
DQ Write 195
DQ Mixed 53.9
80% 150 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 56.4%
Great: 85%
APPLE HDD TOSHIB 750GB
79GB free, PID 1066
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 21 18 25 28 28 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
14.1% Very poor
Read 26.1
Write 23.5
Mixed 21.5
SusWrite 24.5
32% 23.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
73% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.1%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B1G73DB0-YK0 Kingston ACR16D3LS1KFG/8G 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
56.6% Above average
MC Read 21.6
MC Write 19.8
MC Mixed 17.2
56% 19.5 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 17.7
51% 17.7 GB/s
Latency 72.3
55% 72.3 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback