TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

MSI MS-16J9

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics23.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive99.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star GL62M 7RDX
MotherboardMSI MS-16J9  (all builds)
Memory8.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170522
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 20 '18 at 06:32
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
73% Very good
Memory 80.8
1-Core 99
2-Core 196
72% 125 Pts
4-Core 377
8-Core 377
50% 377 Pts
64-Core 382
24% 382 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑
This bench: 73%
 Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSI(1462 11C8) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 25.21.14.1634
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
23.4% Poor
Lighting 28.5
Reflection 23.2
Parallax 24.3
23% 25.4 fps
MRender 35.1
Gravity 32.6
Splatting 22.1
24% 30 fps
Poor: 18% ↑
This bench: 23.4%
 Great: 25%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Pcie SSD 256GB
134GB free (System drive)
Firmware: E8FM11.3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 443 213 206 223 204 208 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
99.5% Outstanding
Read 658
Write 252
Mixed 443
SusWrite 250
89% 401 MB/s
4K Read 31
4K Write 66.9
4K Mixed 36
128% 44.6 MB/s
DQ Read 556
DQ Write 266
DQ Mixed 496
346% 440 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑
This bench: 99.5%
 Great: 214%
Seagate ST1000LM048-2E7172 1TB
901GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 133 131 130 128 119 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
72.1% Very good
Read 123
Write 124
Mixed 56.8
SusWrite 128
79% 108 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
201% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑
This bench: 72.1%
 Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5143EB1-CRC 859B CT8G4SFD824A.C16FHP 12GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
74.5% Very good
MC Read 27
MC Write 29.5
MC Mixed 24.2
77% 26.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.7
SC Write 27.9
SC Mixed 21.2
61% 21.3 GB/s
Latency 79.1
51% 79.1 ns
Poor: 60% ↑
This bench: 74.5%
 Great: 80%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical MS-16J9 Builds (Compare 3,784 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-16J9

CPU
Core i7-7700HQIntelBench 62%, 473,208 samples2,480x
Core i5-7300HQIntelBench 57%, 170,871 samples1,304x
GPU
HD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 310,249 samples2,256x
GTX 1050 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 23%, 160,694 samples1,024x
GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 29%, 105,856 samples503x
SSD
THNSNJ256G8NY 256GBToshibaBench 76%, 12,683 samples211x
PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 128GBSamsungBench 176%, 11,069 samples127x
THNSNJ128G8NY 128GBToshibaBench 73%, 7,789 samples110x
RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 37%, 122,420 samples764x
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 1x8GBHynixBench 37%, 144,145 samples310x
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 70%, 62,266 samples215x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback