| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 30.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 54.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| System | Fujitsu CELSIUS W520 (all builds) |
| Motherboard | FUJITSU D3167-A1 |
| Memory | 12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 3840x2160x4294967296 szín |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20141201 |
| Uptime | 5 Days |
| Run Date | Dec 17 '18 at 21:59 |
| Run Duration | 125 Seconds |
| Run User | HUN-User |
| Background CPU | 8% |
PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E3-1240 V2-$345
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
|
71.8%
Very good
|
74% 128 Pts
|
49% 399 Pts
|
30% 493 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 399.24
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
30.4%
Below average
|
31% 34.3 fps
|
29% 35.4 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston HyperX 3K 240GB-$70
153GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 506ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 206 179 166 170 182 208 MB/s
|
54.4%
Above average
|
48% 211 MB/s
|
82% 27.5 MB/s
|
119% 166 MB/s
|
|
WD My Passport 0830 500GB
68GB free, PID 0830
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 106 105 106 106 106 MB/s
|
44.8%
Average
|
127% 94.3 MB/s
|
104% 1.2 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M391B5273DH0-YK0 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
55.7%
Above average
|
55% 19.2 GB/s
|
50% 17.3 GB/s
|
56% 71.1 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical CELSIUS W520 Builds (Compare 48 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Fujitsu CELSIUS W520
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Xeon E3-1240 V2Intel $345Bench 71%, 4,997 samples | 16x |
| Xeon E3-1225 V2Intel $248Bench 70%, 2,869 samples | 12x |
| Xeon E3-1245 V2Intel $368Bench 73%, 2,442 samples | 6x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples | 11x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 7x |
| HD P4000 (Server 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 4%, 800 samples | 4x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 60% - Above average | Total price: $396 |