Asus Z97-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 57%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics55.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive85.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus Z97-K  (all builds)
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160331
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 17 '18 at 00:38
Run Duration176 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU9%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4690K-$50
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 0.8 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
91.1% Outstanding
Memory 97.6
1-Core 124
2-Core 251
89% 158 Pts
4-Core 488
8-Core 497
66% 492 Pts
64-Core 496
31% 496 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 91.1%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
Gigabyte(1458 3772) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2138 MHz, MLim: 2112 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 417.35
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
55.9% Above average
Lighting 64.7
Reflection 120
Parallax 118
53% 101 fps
MRender 105
Gravity 0.27
Splatting 112
62% 72.2 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend SSD370 128GB-$74
23GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20140402
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 146 121 142 149 132 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
85.9% Excellent
Read 510
Write 151
Mixed 209
SusWrite 137
55% 252 MB/s
4K Read 30.4
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 40.8
156% 60 MB/s
DQ Read 267
DQ Write 152
DQ Mixed 150
128% 190 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 85.9%
Great: 83%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
220GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 540 570 565 554 576 577 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
189% Outstanding
Read 752
Write 656
Mixed 662
SusWrite 564
148% 659 MB/s
4K Read 67.3
4K Write 144
4K Mixed 89.8
293% 100 MB/s
DQ Read 779
DQ Write 680
DQ Mixed 1,094
720% 851 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 189%
Great: 340%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
466GB free
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 258 266 277 256 270 276 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
120% Outstanding
Read 496
Write 485
Mixed 413
SusWrite 267
93% 415 MB/s
4K Read 44.9
4K Write 123
4K Mixed 65.9
218% 77.9 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 349
DQ Mixed 360
271% 362 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 120%
Great: 134%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$32
931GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 170 167 171 169 169 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
93.6% Outstanding
Read 157
Write 163
Mixed 39
SusWrite 169
96% 132 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.6
150% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 93.6%
Great: 107%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
518GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 175 161 180 168 176 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 182
Write 170
Mixed 35.7
SusWrite 173
101% 140 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
148% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 102%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 2400 C11 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 2448 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
89.9% Excellent
MC Read 32
MC Write 34.6
MC Mixed 29.2
91% 31.9 GB/s
SC Read 21.9
SC Write 23.8
SC Mixed 28.1
70% 24.6 GB/s
Latency 48
83% 48 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 89.9%
Great: 91%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z97-K Builds (Compare 3,090 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus Z97-K - $147

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $795
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback