MSI Z370 GAMING M5 (MS-7B58)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics55.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive252% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (65%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B58
MotherboardMSI Z370 GAMING M5 (MS-7B58)  (all builds)
Memory3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171221
Uptime2.4 Days
Run DateDec 15 '18 at 19:53
Run Duration171 Seconds
Run User IRL-User
Background CPU 65%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8600K-$173
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
97.8% Outstanding
Memory 96.5
1-Core 131
2-Core 268
92% 165 Pts
4-Core 534
8-Core 770
82% 652 Pts
64-Core 783
48% 783 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 97.8%
Great: 101%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1350 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 17.10.1
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
55.9% Above average
Lighting 71.1
Reflection 68.3
Parallax 87.6
58% 75.7 fps
MRender 70
Gravity 68.6
Splatting 55.7
52% 64.8 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$92
87GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 505 280 276 275 268 268 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
252% Outstanding
Read 2,401
Write 1,359
Mixed 1,166
SusWrite 312
289% 1,310 MB/s
4K Read 57.5
4K Write 162
4K Mixed 78.1
273% 99.1 MB/s
DQ Read 966
DQ Write 1,407
DQ Mixed 985
801% 1,119 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 252%
Great: 280%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
271GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 463 479 475 479 419 278 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
128% Outstanding
Read 509
Write 482
Mixed 456
SusWrite 432
106% 470 MB/s
4K Read 44.6
4K Write 123
4K Mixed 60.1
210% 75.8 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 360
271% 363 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 128%
Great: 129%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110
2.5TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 88 87 87 88 90 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
47.5% Average
Read 77
Write 74
Mixed 62.3
SusWrite 88.1
56% 75.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
144% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 47.5%
Great: 100%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60
305GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 105 105 107 108 110 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
61.2% Good
Read 106
Write 96
Mixed 55.5
SusWrite 107
67% 91.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
136% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 61.2%
Great: 83%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$95
245GB free
Firmware: CC3C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 114 112 113 114 113 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
63.2% Good
Read 107
Write 102
Mixed 62.2
SusWrite 114
70% 96 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
126% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 63.2%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x4GB-$40
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
98.9% Outstanding
MC Read 39.3
MC Write 38
MC Mixed 28
100% 35.1 GB/s
SC Read 21.3
SC Write 36.4
SC Mixed 30.8
84% 29.5 GB/s
Latency 52.3
76% 52.3 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 98.9%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z370 GAMING M5 (MS-7B58) Builds (Compare 2,175 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 112%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI Z370 GAMING M5 (MS-7B58) - $185

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Excellent Total price: $1,006
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback