Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 71% Battleship	Desktop 92% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 72% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	77.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	200% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING (all builds)
Memory	27.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180712
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 15 '18 at 03:10
Run Duration	269 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	14%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$210 159,077 User benchmarks, average bench 76% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 4.15 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	83.7% Excellent	Memory 85.4 1-Core 127 2-Core 251 86% 154 Pts	4-Core 440 8-Core 767 73% 604 Pts	64-Core 1,377 85% 1,377 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 83.7% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Nvidia(10DE 119D) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 416.34 Performing below potential (42^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	77.9% Very good	Lighting 95.6 Reflection 107 Parallax 92 78% 98.2 fps	MRender 95.7 Gravity 92 Splatting 96.9 78% 94.9 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 77.9% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 381,216 User benchmarks, average bench 273% 371GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1140 1122 608 610 605 602 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	200% Outstanding	Read 1,444 Write 1,170 Mixed 1,107 SusWrite 781 252% 1,126 MB/s	4K Read 57 4K Write 106 4K Mixed 69.6 232% 77.4 MB/s	DQ Read 544 DQ Write 484 DQ Mixed 524 390% 518 MB/s
Poor: 199% ↑ This bench: 200% Great: 340%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 187GB free Firmware: RVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 479 404 314 314 314 313 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	117% Outstanding	Read 509 Write 477 Mixed 459 SusWrite 356 101% 450 MB/s	4K Read 39.8 4K Write 100 4K Mixed 55.7 185% 65.3 MB/s	DQ Read 388 DQ Write 361 DQ Mixed 370 279% 373 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 117% Great: 129%
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150 68,337 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 316GB free Firmware: EXT0DB6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 474 425 408 410 411 407 MB/s Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	118% Outstanding	Read 496 Write 478 Mixed 421 SusWrite 423 102% 455 MB/s	4K Read 40.9 4K Write 92.7 4K Mixed 53.7 180% 62.4 MB/s	DQ Read 374 DQ Write 356 DQ Mixed 252 220% 328 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 118% Great: 126%
Samsung 840 250GB-$251 41,998 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 213GB free Firmware: DXT0AB0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 252 251 253 252 251 251 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	70.8% Very good	Read 356 Write 260 Mixed 160 SusWrite 252 57% 257 MB/s	4K Read 26.5 4K Write 67.2 4K Mixed 23.7 106% 39.1 MB/s	DQ Read 216 DQ Write 204 DQ Mixed 53.7 83% 158 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 70.8% Great: 85%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$64 103,919 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 360GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 61 60 59 61 61 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	40.5% Average	Read 80.5 Write 75.5 Mixed 56.8 SusWrite 60.3 50% 68.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.6 124% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 40.5% Great: 57%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 6TB 10,357 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 1TB free Firmware: D781 SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 97 100 99 101 101 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	53.9% Above average	Read 86.5 Write 115 Mixed 93.5 SusWrite 99.1 73% 98.6 MB/s	4K Read 4.3 4K Write 4.1 4K Mixed 0.6 322% 3 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 53.9% Great: 90%
Elite Pro USB 3TB 30 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 1.5TB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 180 185 183 180 179 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	107% Outstanding	Read 190 Write 168 Mixed 32.7 SusWrite 182 103% 143 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.6 153% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown F4-3200C16-8GTZB CMU16GX4M2C3000C15 F4-3200C16-8GTZB CMU16GX4M2C3000C15 32GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 3000, 3000, 3000, 3000 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	97.1% Outstanding	MC Read 38.4 MC Write 33.1 MC Mixed 33.1 100% 34.9 GB/s	SC Read 26.8 SC Write 34.5 SC Mixed 28.9 86% 30.1 GB/s	Latency 71.7 56% 71.7 ns
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 97.1% Great: 84%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING Builds (Compare 3,859 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 82%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 80%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING - $190

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	1,437x
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	307x
Ryzen 5 2600XAMD $120Bench 74%, 142,983 samples	281x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	234x
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	232x
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	202x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	189x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	188x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	177x

RAM
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	202x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	142x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	134x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 74% - Very good

Total price: $1,013

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING - $190

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)