Performance Results


Gaming 17% Surfboard	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 14% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	17.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	57.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

PC Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2310-$90 15,623 User benchmarks, average bench 65% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	72.6% Very good	Memory 91.3 1-Core 82.6 2-Core 162 68% 112 Pts	4-Core 316 8-Core 304 42% 310 Pts	64-Core 317 20% 317 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 72.6% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92 309,423 User benchmarks, average bench 17% EVGA(3842 3751) CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 417.35 Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	17.7% Very poor	Lighting 22.1 Reflection 16.8 Parallax 19.8 18% 19.6 fps	MRender 24.9 Gravity 22.4 Splatting 16.8 17% 21.4 fps
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 17.7% Great: 19%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
TEAML5Lite3D120G 120GB 2,389 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 78GB free (System drive) Firmware: Q0410A SusWrite @10s intervals: 213 148 147 148 148 149 MB/s Performing below potential (10^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	57.4% Above average	Read 222 Write 210 Mixed 212 SusWrite 159 45% 201 MB/s	4K Read 30.8 4K Write 44.9 4K Mixed 34.8 115% 36.8 MB/s	DQ Read 41.9 DQ Write 86.8 DQ Mixed 52.4 43% 60.4 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 57.4% Great: 110%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CT51264BA160BJ.C8 CT51264BA160BJ.C8F 8GB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	47.6% Average	MC Read 17 MC Write 16.7 MC Mixed 14.4 46% 16 GB/s	SC Read 13.8 SC Write 14.3 SC Mixed 14.9 41% 14.3 GB/s	Latency 65.2 61% 65.2 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 47.6% Great: 48%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 51%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	3x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	1x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	1x

SSD
TEAML5Lite3D120G 120GBBench 88%, 2,389 samples	1x
AS350 128GBApacerBench 65%, 2,222 samples	1x
WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TBWDCBench 98%, 74,123 samples	1x

RAM
RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBG.SKILLBench 53%, 47,852 samples	1x
V01D3LF4GB26826813 2x4GBUnknownBench 42%, 113 samples	1x
BLS4G3D1339DS1S00. 2x4GBCrucialBench 48%, 1,673 samples	1x

Value: 82% - Excellent

Total price: $49