MSI Z87-G45 GAMING (MS-7821)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics29.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive96.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7821
MotherboardMSI Z87-G45 GAMING (MS-7821)  (all builds)
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140721
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 15 '18 at 00:20
Run Duration184 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770K-$120
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
78.8% Very good
Memory 94.2
1-Core 112
2-Core 217
82% 141 Pts
4-Core 342
8-Core 537
54% 439 Pts
64-Core 572
35% 572 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 78.8%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209
EVGA(3842 2765) 2GB
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
29.1% Poor
Lighting 34.1
Reflection 30.8
Parallax 39.2
28% 34.7 fps
MRender 42.7
Gravity 40.5
Splatting 34.6
32% 39.3 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 29.1%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$100
61GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 317 115 50 36 35 35 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
96.9% Outstanding
Read 482
Write 454
Mixed 340
SusWrite 98.1
77% 344 MB/s
4K Read 42.3
4K Write 99.3
4K Mixed 54
186% 65.2 MB/s
DQ Read 322
DQ Write 303
DQ Mixed 52.9
111% 226 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 96.9%
Great: 118%
Seagate ST37500NSSUN750G 0807A4XV5G 750GB
308GB free
Firmware: 3AZQ
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 64 63 64 64 64 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
37% Below average
Read 64.9
Write 61.8
Mixed 48.5
SusWrite 63.8
44% 59.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
120% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 37%
Great: 37%
ST310005 28AS 1TB
137GB free, PID 2509
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.3 4.8 4.9 4.7 4.7 5.3 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
11.1% Very poor
Read 40.1
Write 40.9
Mixed 31.3
SusWrite 4.9
38% 29.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
78% 1 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.1%
Great: 19%
ST310005 28AS 1TB
141GB free, PID 2509
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 37 37 37 38 38 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
18.1% Very poor
Read 37.6
Write 40.9
Mixed 30.6
SusWrite 37.2
50% 36.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 1
85% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 18.1%
Great: 19%
Generic- USB3.0 CRW -SD 32GB
26GB free, PID 0326
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 36 36 37 41 41 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
24.5% Poor
Read 40.4
Write 37.5
Mixed 30.6
SusWrite 37
49% 36.4 MB/s
4K Read 8.3
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 3.7
252% 4.93 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 24.5%
Great: 42%
Kingston DataTraveler R3.0 USB 3.0 16GB-$15
8GB free, PID 168e
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 47 47 47 47 47 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
40.4% Average
Read 190
Write 46.2
Mixed 26.6
SusWrite 44.4
78% 76.9 MB/s
4K Read 6.6
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.5
58% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 40.4%
Great: 40%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1600 CL9 Series 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
61.6% Good
MC Read 22.1
MC Write 22.1
MC Mixed 19.4
60% 21.2 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 20.5
SC Mixed 19.7
53% 18.4 GB/s
Latency 59.2
68% 59.2 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 61.6%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z87-G45 GAMING (MS-7821) Builds (Compare 4,056 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat

Motherboard: MSI Z87-G45 GAMING (MS-7821) - $242

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Good Total price: $682
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback