Asus P9X79 PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics49.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive69% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P9X79 PRO  (all builds)
Memory10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1600 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140507
Uptime3 Days
Run DateJun 26 '16 at 16:53
Run Duration302 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3820
LGA2011, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
80.4% Excellent
Memory 91
1-Core 114
2-Core 217
81% 141 Pts
4-Core 377
8-Core 559
58% 468 Pts
64-Core 615
38% 615 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.6839
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
49.9% Average
Lighting 60.8
Reflection 68.7
Parallax 59.3
50% 62.9 fps
MRender 71.7
Gravity 58.6
Splatting 58
51% 62.8 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 49.9%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 520 Series 180GB-$132
84GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 400i Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
69% Good
Read 473
Write 188
Mixed 250
66% 303 MB/s
4K Read 26.1
4K Write 83.8
4K Mixed 11.6
99% 40.5 MB/s
DQ Read 271
DQ Write 209
DQ Mixed 73.7
100% 184 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 69%
Great: 88%
Intel 750 Series NVMe PCIe 400GB-$550
60GB free
Firmware: 0135 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
183% Outstanding
Read 1,670
Write 899
Mixed 1,131
272% 1,233 MB/s
4K Read 26.8
4K Write 141
4K Mixed 26.8
150% 64.9 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 373
DQ Mixed 177
188% 311 MB/s
Poor: 123%
This bench: 183%
Great: 230%
Intel 520 Series 180GB-$132
56GB free
Firmware: 400i Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
56.1% Above average
Read 350
Write 157
Mixed 221
53% 243 MB/s
4K Read 24.8
4K Write 47.8
4K Mixed 15.6
83% 29.4 MB/s
DQ Read 243
DQ Write 124
DQ Mixed 70.6
82% 146 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 88%
Intel 520 Series 240GB-$139
28GB free
Firmware: 400i Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
84.1% Excellent
Read 509
Write 277
Mixed 300
80% 362 MB/s
4K Read 31.5
4K Write 89.6
4K Mixed 20.7
122% 47.3 MB/s
DQ Read 256
DQ Write 251
DQ Mixed 84.3
110% 197 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 84.1%
Great: 95%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$55
1TB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
36.7% Below average
Read 94.2
Write 34
Mixed 51
45% 59.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.36
4K Write 0.34
4K Mixed 0.22
46% 0.31 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 36.7%
Great: 67%
WD Black 640GB (2008)-$25
488GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
52.7% Above average
Read 97.5
Write 86
Mixed 72.4
64% 85.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.84
4K Write 1.49
4K Mixed 0.43
111% 0.92 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 52.7%
Great: 65%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 500GB-$80
265GB free
Firmware: SD15 Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
45.9% Average
Read 74.1
Write 85.6
Mixed 80.8
60% 80.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.53
4K Write 1.55
4K Mixed 0.47
103% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 45.9%
Great: 59%
Hitachi HDT725025VLAT80 250GB
29GB free, PID 0651
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
18.4% Very poor
Read 36.4
Write 35.3
Mixed 35.2
46% 35.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.66
4K Write 1.71
4K Mixed 0.35
72% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 18.4%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair XMS3 DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1066 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
84.4% Excellent
MC Read 32.1
MC Write 34.2
MC Mixed 30.2
92% 32.2 GB/s
SC Read 15.6
SC Write 16.7
SC Mixed 14.4
44% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 65.8
61% 65.8 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 84.4%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P9X79 PRO Builds (Compare 1,424 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus P9X79 PRO - $374

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $924
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback