Biostar X370GTN

Performance Results


Gaming 16% Surfboard	Desktop 65% Destroyer	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	24.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	71.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Biostar X370GTN (all builds)
Memory	13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170623
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 13 '18 at 02:12
Run Duration	127 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	15%

PC Performing as expected (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon X4 950 Quad Core 4,334 User benchmarks, average bench 41% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	55.4% Above average	Memory 73.2 1-Core 66.4 2-Core 138 55% 92.4 Pts	4-Core 220 8-Core 221 29% 220 Pts	64-Core 220 14% 220 Pts
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 55.4% Great: 52%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 560-$500 60,738 User benchmarks, average bench 22% Gigabyte(1458 22FF) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1224 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 18.9.3 Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	24.1% Poor	Lighting 29.1 Reflection 29.5 Parallax 36.6 24% 31.8 fps	MRender 30.3 Gravity 25.6 Splatting 33.7 25% 29.9 fps
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 24.1% Great: 25%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Blue SATA M.2 250GB-$89 7,519 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 97GB free (System drive) Firmware: X41110WD SusWrite @10s intervals: 291 202 185 191 193 191 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	71.6% Very good	Read 446 Write 396 Mixed 327 SusWrite 209 77% 344 MB/s	4K Read 23.8 4K Write 39.2 4K Mixed 27.9 93% 30.3 MB/s	DQ Read 294 DQ Write 256 DQ Mixed 233 186% 261 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 71.6% Great: 100%
Seagate ST1000LM048-2E7172 1TB 89,596 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 866GB free Firmware: SDM1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 126 128 131 131 132 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	63.1% Good	Read 91 Write 116 Mixed 53.5 SusWrite 128 71% 96.9 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 4.4 4K Mixed 0.7 201% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 63.1% Great: 71%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 8GBF2X04JEEE36-12-K 2x8GB 2,065 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	35.2% Below average	MC Read 15.3 MC Write 8.2 MC Mixed 14.6 36% 12.7 GB/s	SC Read 7.2 SC Write 4.6 SC Mixed 9.5 20% 7.1 GB/s	Latency 94.2 42% 94.2 ns
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 35.2% Great: 87%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X370GTN Builds (Compare 78 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 30%

Raft

Desktop 82%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 28%

Raft

Motherboard: Biostar X370GTN

CPU
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	15x
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	7x
Ryzen 5 2400GAMD $135Bench 63%, 127,344 samples	6x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	7x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	6x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	5x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	4x
NE-256 256GBBench 159%, 6,044 samples	4x
CS900 240GBPNY $25Bench 73%, 61,417 samples	3x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $39Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	3x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	3x
Skill Intl F4-3000C16-8GISB 2x8GBGBench 85%, 4,000 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 116% - Outstanding

Total price: $303

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4070 $515	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16