Asrock Z370M Pro4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 63%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics60.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock Z370M Pro4  (all builds)
Memory27.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180921
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 12 '18 at 10:12
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8600K-$125
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
99.9% Outstanding
Memory 93.6
1-Core 142
2-Core 285
96% 174 Pts
4-Core 571
8-Core 854
89% 713 Pts
64-Core 843
52% 843 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 99.9%
Great: 101%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 416.81
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
60.8% Good
Lighting 76.1
Reflection 78.3
Parallax 67.6
62% 74 fps
MRender 71.1
Gravity 70.1
Splatting 72.2
58% 71.2 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 60.8%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
119GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 9,954
Write 8,810
Mixed 9,086
2,071% 9,283 MB/s
4K Read 812
4K Write 610
4K Mixed 702
2,453% 708 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 360
271% 362 MB/s
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$84
266GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 75 76 75 76 76 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
43.2% Average
Read 74.5
Write 77
Mixed 53.1
SusWrite 75.4
52% 70 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
176% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 84%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT16G4DFD8266.C16FD1 859B CT16G4DFD8266.M16FD 32GB
2667, 2667 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
93.2% Outstanding
MC Read 35
MC Write 35.2
MC Mixed 29.2
95% 33.1 GB/s
SC Read 20.2
SC Write 38
SC Mixed 27.5
82% 28.6 GB/s
Latency 60.7
66% 60.7 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 93.2%
Great: 93%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z370M Pro4 Builds (Compare 1,432 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asrock Z370M Pro4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $452
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback