TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus P8Z77-V LX2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics34% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive58% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
MotherboardAsus P8Z77-V LX2  (all builds)
Memory9.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120928
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateDec 12 '18 at 03:55
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570K-$50
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
86% Excellent
Memory 92.9
1-Core 118
2-Core 234
84% 148 Pts
4-Core 458
8-Core 457
61% 457 Pts
64-Core 463
29% 463 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑
This bench: 86%
 Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 670-$435
Gainward(10B0 1189) 2GB
CLim: 1384 MHz, MLim: 1744 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 416.94
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
34% Below average
Lighting 39.9
Reflection 37.8
Parallax 49.1
32% 42.3 fps
MRender 53.6
Gravity 46.2
Splatting 38.9
37% 46.2 fps
Poor: 25% ↑
This bench: 34%
 Great: 31%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 120GB-$109
16GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXT07B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 71 67 52 47 48 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
58% Above average
Read 427
Write 111
Mixed 110
SusWrite 60
38% 177 MB/s
4K Read 24
4K Write 70.6
4K Mixed 17.6
96% 37.4 MB/s
DQ Read 304
DQ Write 98.8
DQ Mixed 47.5
75% 150 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑
This bench: 58%
 Great: 73%
Seagate Video SV35.6 Series 2TB-$121
1.5TB free
Firmware: CV22
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 177 175 173 176 176 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
98.5% Outstanding
Read 175
Write 167
Mixed 73.2
SusWrite 169
106% 146 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
124% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑
This bench: 98.5%
 Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
53.5% Above average
MC Read 18.4
MC Write 18.8
MC Mixed 16.9
52% 18 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 18.5
SC Mixed 17.4
48% 17 GB/s
Latency 62.3
64% 62.3 ns
Poor: 33% ↑
This bench: 53.5%
 Great: 62%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical P8Z77-V LX2 Builds (Compare 1,226 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8Z77-V LX2

CPU
Core i5-3570KIntel  $50Bench 68%, 185,516 samples294x
Core i7-3770Intel  $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples251x
Core i7-3770KIntel  $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples223x
GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia  $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples101x
GTX 970Nvidia  $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples99x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia  $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples59x
SSD
A400 240GBKingston  $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples46x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung  $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples37x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung  $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples35x
RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples36x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples29x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples26x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $195
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback