TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus P8Z77-V LX2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics30.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive66.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
MotherboardAsus P8Z77-V LX2  (all builds)
Memory13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120928
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 11 '18 at 04:50
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570K-$50
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
84.9% Excellent
Memory 89.3
1-Core 116
2-Core 232
82% 146 Pts
4-Core 467
8-Core 456
62% 462 Pts
64-Core 467
29% 467 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑
This bench: 84.9%
 Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 670-$435
Gainward(10B0 1189) 2GB
CLim: 1254 MHz, MLim: 1527 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 416.94
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
30.4% Below average
Lighting 35.3
Reflection 34.8
Parallax 44.8
29% 38.3 fps
MRender 48.4
Gravity 41.3
Splatting 35.3
33% 41.7 fps
Poor: 25% ↑
This bench: 30.4%
 Great: 31%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 120GB-$109
19GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXT07B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 123 127 96 109 60 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
66.5% Good
Read 447
Write 121
Mixed 105
SusWrite 99.5
42% 193 MB/s
4K Read 26.7
4K Write 93.7
4K Mixed 18.9
114% 46.4 MB/s
DQ Read 306
DQ Write 107
DQ Mixed 47.6
77% 154 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑
This bench: 66.5%
 Great: 73%
Seagate Video SV35.6 Series 2TB-$121
1.5TB free
Firmware: CV22
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 182 184 183 184 180 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
94.2% Outstanding
Read 155
Write 163
Mixed 71.7
SusWrite 173
103% 141 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
122% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑
This bench: 94.2%
 Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
52.4% Above average
MC Read 18.4
MC Write 18.7
MC Mixed 16.7
51% 17.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 17.9
SC Mixed 16
45% 15.8 GB/s
Latency 68.2
59% 68.2 ns
Poor: 33% ↑
This bench: 52.4%
 Great: 62%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical P8Z77-V LX2 Builds (Compare 1,226 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8Z77-V LX2

CPU
Core i5-3570KIntel  $50Bench 68%, 185,516 samples294x
Core i7-3770Intel  $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples251x
Core i7-3770KIntel  $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples223x
GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia  $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples101x
GTX 970Nvidia  $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples99x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia  $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples59x
SSD
A400 240GBKingston  $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples46x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung  $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples37x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung  $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples35x
RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples36x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples29x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples26x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $195
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products, which UserBenchmark reveals.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback