Asus F1A55-M LE R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics57.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsus F1A55-M LE R2.0  (all builds)
Memory6.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120620
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 12 '18 at 02:34
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-3870 APU-$81
FM1 , 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
54.5% Above average
Memory 77.5
1-Core 46.9
2-Core 94.2
47% 72.9 Pts
4-Core 185
8-Core 186
25% 186 Pts
64-Core 186
12% 186 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 54.5%
Great: 56%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
HP(103C 82FC) 3GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 417.22
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
57.5% Above average
Lighting 70.8
Reflection 68.7
Parallax 61.4
58% 67 fps
MRender 73.1
Gravity 67
Splatting 69.6
57% 69.9 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 57.5%
Great: 56%
AMD Radeon HD 6450
Asus(1043 03DA) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
1.73% Terrible
Lighting 2.3
Reflection 2.31
Parallax 1.97
2% 2.19 fps
MRender 1.9
Gravity 1.57
Splatting 1.87
2% 1.78 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.73%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 250GB (2010)-$43
50GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 71 82 90 81 82 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
54.5% Above average
Read 110
Write 98.9
Mixed 62
SusWrite 79.9
64% 87.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
149% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 54.5%
Great: 70%
Hitachi HUA722020ALA330 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: JKAOA3EA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 112 114 119 112 113 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
65.8% Good
Read 115
Write 119
Mixed 46.3
SusWrite 115
72% 98.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.9
152% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 70%
WDC WD16 00BEVT-75A23T0 160GB
91GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 30 31 31 30 30 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
15.3% Very poor
Read 27.6
Write 27
Mixed 23.2
SusWrite 30.2
37% 27 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
73% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 1%
This bench: 15.3%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMX4GX3M1A1600C9 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
38.9% Below average
MC Read 16.2
MC Write 13.7
MC Mixed 11.9
40% 13.9 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 9.3
24% 8.33 GB/s
Latency 85.4
47% 85.4 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 38.9%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical F1A55-M LE R2.0 Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus F1A55-M LE R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $109
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback