MSI X99A GAMING 7 (MS-7885)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (95th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 5 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics48.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive107% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7885
MotherboardMSI X99A GAMING 7 (MS-7885)  (all builds)
Memory6.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180615
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 11 '18 at 21:51
Run Duration109 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.15 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
94.1% Outstanding
Memory 96
1-Core 129
2-Core 251
90% 158 Pts
4-Core 496
8-Core 797
79% 646 Pts
64-Core 1,004
62% 1,004 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 94.1%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 780-$329
Gainward(10B0 1004) 3GB
CLim: 1241 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
48.3% Average
Lighting 59
Reflection 52.3
Parallax 69.1
48% 60.1 fps
MRender 68.5
Gravity 63.3
Splatting 50.3
49% 60.7 fps
Poor: 41%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 49%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
83GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0CB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 236 99 115 127 127 125 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 504
Write 487
Mixed 350
SusWrite 138
83% 370 MB/s
4K Read 46.4
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 55.2
203% 73.2 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 326
DQ Mixed 176
180% 293 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 107%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 9905625-062.A00G 1x8GB
1 of 8 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 3001 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
47% Average
MC Read 20.7
MC Write 11
MC Mixed 14
44% 15.2 GB/s
SC Read 16.2
SC Write 11.1
SC Mixed 17.3
42% 14.9 GB/s
Latency 54
74% 54 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 47%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99A GAMING 7 (MS-7885) Builds (Compare 708 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 69%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: MSI X99A GAMING 7 (MS-7885)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $410
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback