Acer Aspire XC-705

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.36% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Very high background CPU (90%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire XC-705  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire XC-705
Memory3.8 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20140807
Uptime6.1 Days
Run DateJun 25 '16 at 12:38
Run Duration371 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 90%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G3250
LGA1150, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
59.9% Above average
Memory 88.2
1-Core 95.9
2-Core 186
72% 123 Pts
4-Core 186
8-Core 183
25% 185 Pts
64-Core 185
12% 185 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G4 Pentium/Celeron 1.05/1.15 GHz)
Acer(1025 0750) 2.2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.3496
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
2.36% Terrible
Lighting 2.77
Reflection 3.65
Parallax 3.25
2% 3.22 fps
MRender 4.24
Gravity 1.13
Splatting 3.87
3% 3.08 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.36%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
705GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
78.2% Very good
Read 138
Write 135
Mixed 111
96% 128 MB/s
4K Read 1.09
4K Write 1.87
4K Mixed 0.27
110% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 78.2%
Great: 109%
Toshiba StorE steel 2.5" 500GB
406GB free, PID 0b12
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
13.1% Very poor
Read 32.8
Write 33.9
Mixed 33.9
44% 33.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.44
4K Write 0.29
4K Mixed 0.16
17% 0.29 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 13.1%
Great: 18%
Clikfree Backup Drive 1TB
244GB free, PID 0808
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
17.6% Very poor
Read 36.8
Write 34.6
Mixed 25
40% 32.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.57
4K Write 1.51
4K Mixed 0.25
62% 0.78 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 17.6%
Great: 19%
Maxtor 3200 320GB
175GB free, PID 3200
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
16% Very poor
Read 34.8
Write 32.8
Mixed 33.9
43% 33.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.48
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.34
54% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 16%
Great: 17%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 16GB
13GB free, PID 6545
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
5.68% Terrible
Read 21.2
Write 5.38
Mixed 6.44
11% 11 MB/s
4K Read 6.03
4K Write 0.005
4K Mixed 0.01
23% 2.01 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.68%
Great: 6%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR16D3LU1MNG/4G ACR16D3LFU1KBG/2G 6GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
29.4% Poor
MC Read 9.7
MC Write 9.7
MC Mixed 8.2
26% 9.2 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 9.6
SC Mixed 8.5
26% 9.17 GB/s
Latency 69.3
58% 69.3 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 29.4%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire XC-705 Builds (Compare 261 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire XC-705

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $222
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback