Hasee QTK5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics17% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive64.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHasee QTK5  (all builds)
MotherboardType2 Type2 - Board Product Name1
Memory5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150127
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateDec 11 '18 at 14:45
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4710MQ-$44
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
69.5% Good
Memory 90.7
1-Core 72
2-Core 145
63% 103 Pts
4-Core 263
8-Core 382
40% 323 Pts
64-Core 384
24% 384 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960M
Quanta(152D 1121) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 25.21.14.1681
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
17% Very poor
Lighting 22.5
Reflection 16.8
Parallax 19.7
18% 19.7 fps
MRender 24.4
Gravity 12.2
Splatting 17
14% 17.9 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 17%
Great: 18%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
ACSC2M128mSA 128GB
77GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20150529
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 201 201 211 211 208 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
64.4% Good
Read 428
Write 204
Mixed 184
SusWrite 197
56% 253 MB/s
4K Read 21.8
4K Write 78.6
4K Mixed 14.9
94% 38.4 MB/s
DQ Read 167
DQ Write 196
DQ Mixed 81.1
89% 148 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 64.4%
Great: 60%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
908GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 120 120 122 120 121 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
71.9% Very good
Read 131
Write 125
Mixed 28.3
SusWrite 120
73% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
115% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 71.9%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B1G73QH0-YK0 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
30.8% Below average
MC Read 10.3
MC Write 10.1
MC Mixed 8.3
27% 9.57 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 11.4
SC Mixed 9.7
28% 9.97 GB/s
Latency 66.2
60% 66.2 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 30.8%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical QTK5 Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Hasee QTK5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $110
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback