Hasee QTK5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics12.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive65% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHasee QTK5  (all builds)
MotherboardType2 Type2 - Board Product Name1
Memory4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150127
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateDec 11 '18 at 10:27
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4710MQ-$44
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
68.5% Good
Memory 90.8
1-Core 73
2-Core 145
63% 103 Pts
4-Core 251
8-Core 388
40% 319 Pts
64-Core 390
24% 390 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 68.5%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960M
Quanta(152D 1121) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 25.21.14.1681
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
12.5% Very poor
Lighting 13.9
Reflection 16.7
Parallax 12.3
11% 14.3 fps
MRender 24.4
Gravity 14.3
Splatting 16.9
15% 18.5 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.5%
Great: 18%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
ACSC2M128mSA 128GB
77GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20150529
SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 206 210 212 211 212 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
65% Good
Read 397
Write 207
Mixed 187
SusWrite 204
55% 249 MB/s
4K Read 22.4
4K Write 82.3
4K Mixed 15.5
97% 40.1 MB/s
DQ Read 180
DQ Write 195
DQ Mixed 82
91% 152 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 65%
Great: 60%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
908GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 119 113 120 121 117 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
71.3% Very good
Read 132
Write 124
Mixed 28.2
SusWrite 117
72% 100 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
119% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 71.3%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B1G73QH0-YK0 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
31.8% Below average
MC Read 10.7
MC Write 10.2
MC Mixed 8.8
28% 9.9 GB/s
SC Read 9.8
SC Write 11.8
SC Mixed 9.4
30% 10.3 GB/s
Latency 66
61% 66 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 31.8%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical QTK5 Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Hasee QTK5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $110
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback