Zoostorm 7200-5022B

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics31.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive48.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemZoostorm 7200-5022B  (all builds)
MotherboardGigabyte B85-HD3
Memory7.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140924
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateDec 10 '18 at 15:48
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 19%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4440-$128
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
69.1% Good
Memory 88.1
1-Core 91.9
2-Core 178
70% 119 Pts
4-Core 281
8-Core 349
40% 315 Pts
64-Core 341
21% 341 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 69.1%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 417.22
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
31.2% Below average
Lighting 38.8
Reflection 30.2
Parallax 36.8
32% 35.3 fps
MRender 38.1
Gravity 37.9
Splatting 35.5
30% 37.2 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 31.2%
Great: 33%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
81GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0105A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 353 53 78 71 94 28 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
48.8% Average
Read 495
Write 436
Mixed 419
SusWrite 113
82% 366 MB/s
4K Read 34.9
4K Write 16.6
4K Mixed 1.2
63% 17.6 MB/s
DQ Read 229
DQ Write 10
DQ Mixed 43.1
51% 94.1 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMX4GX3M1A1600C11 0215 CMV8GX3M1A1600C11 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
54.9% Above average
MC Read 18.9
MC Write 21
MC Mixed 17.5
55% 19.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 16.4
SC Mixed 16.6
45% 15.7 GB/s
Latency 69.5
58% 69.5 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 54.9%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 7200-5022B Builds (Compare 29 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

System: Zoostorm 7200-5022B

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $250
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback