Asrock X370 Taichi

Performance Results


Gaming 53% Yacht	Desktop 65% Battle cruiser	Workstation 51% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	90.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (97%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock X370 Taichi (all builds)
Memory	9.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180718
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 09 '18 at 20:53
Run Duration	146 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	97%

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X-$60 30,050 User benchmarks, average bench 72% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	53.3% Above average	Memory 75.1 1-Core 65.2 2-Core 119 53% 86.6 Pts	4-Core 171 8-Core 311 29% 241 Pts	64-Core 842 52% 842 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 53.3% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Vega Frontier Edition-$1,000 1,949 User benchmarks, average bench 86% AMD(1002 6B76) CLim: 1600 MHz, MLim: 945 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 18.12.1 Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	90.2% Outstanding	Lighting 111 Reflection 87.5 Parallax 158 90% 119 fps	MRender 87.5 Gravity 111 Splatting 124 90% 108 fps
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 90.2% Great: 92%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 165,668 User benchmarks, average bench 213% 57GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,934 Write 1,340 Mixed 854 303% 1,376 MB/s	4K Read 48 4K Write 116 4K Mixed 60.3 211% 74.6 MB/s	DQ Read 851 DQ Write 643 DQ Mixed 719 545% 738 MB/s
Poor: 153% Great: 254%
Crucial M4 128GB-$116 34,516 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 78GB free Firmware: 070H SusWrite @10s intervals: 192 174 179 193 193 191 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	64.9% Good	Read 445 Write 188 Mixed 222 SusWrite 187 58% 261 MB/s	4K Read 26.6 4K Write 85.6 4K Mixed 15.3 105% 42.5 MB/s	DQ Read 128 DQ Write 111 DQ Mixed 28.6 46% 89.3 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 64.9% Great: 72%
Samsung M3 Portable 2TB 5,095 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 508GB free, PID 61b5 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 84 85 85 83 84 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	35.9% Below average	Read 83.5 Write 68.7 Mixed 52.2 SusWrite 83.2 96% 71.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 1 98% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 35.9% Great: 52%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GB-$73 54,616 User benchmarks, average bench 98% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	82.7% Excellent	MC Read 32.9 MC Write 29.4 MC Mixed 28.9 87% 30.4 GB/s	SC Read 19.4 SC Write 26.7 SC Mixed 22.7 66% 22.9 GB/s	Latency 90.1 44% 90.1 ns
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 82.7% Great: 129%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X370 Taichi Builds (Compare 632 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 90%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 88%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asrock X370 Taichi - $250

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	120x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $211Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	88x
Ryzen 7 1800XAMD $60Bench 72%, 30,050 samples	73x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	58x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	51x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	44x

SSD
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	30x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	27x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	22x

RAM
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	39x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	23x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $39Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	19x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 70% - Very good

Total price: $1,046

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $289	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16