Asrock H67M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics50.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive88.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock H67M  (all builds)
Memory6.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120427
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 08 '18 at 20:23
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
75.3% Very good
Memory 90
1-Core 91.8
2-Core 180
71% 121 Pts
4-Core 352
8-Core 345
47% 349 Pts
64-Core 341
21% 341 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 290-$399
CLim: 957 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 18.5.1
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
50.5% Above average
Lighting 62.1
Reflection 56.4
Parallax 74.8
51% 64.5 fps
MRender 56.8
Gravity 51.1
Splatting 72
50% 60 fps
Poor: 41%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 50%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$130
130GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 344 190 188 188 152 176 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
88.5% Excellent
Read 480
Write 456
Mixed 329
SusWrite 206
82% 368 MB/s
4K Read 31.2
4K Write 57.8
4K Mixed 39.8
129% 42.9 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 351
DQ Mixed 343
264% 360 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 88.5%
Great: 114%
Hitachi HUA722020ALA330 2TB
146GB free
Firmware: JKAOA3EA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 90 94 96 97 98 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
56.2% Above average
Read 101
Write 72.5
Mixed 50.5
SusWrite 94.4
58% 79.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 70%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
459GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 95 97 97 97 97 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
53.6% Above average
Read 90.2
Write 80.8
Mixed 63.8
SusWrite 96.1
61% 82.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.1
210% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 53.6%
Great: 109%
WD Blue 1TB (2010)-$39
20GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 78 71 59 55 59 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
40.3% Average
Read 73.5
Write 65.3
Mixed 52.2
SusWrite 67
48% 64.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
92% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 40.3%
Great: 74%
Adata S102 Pro USB 3.0 16GB-$22
0GB free, PID 312b
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 171
Write 27
Mixed 35.5
71% 77.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
6% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 8% Great: 27%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-056.A00LF 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
29.4% Poor
MC Read 9.3
MC Write 9.5
MC Mixed 8.6
26% 9.13 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 9.7
SC Mixed 9.1
26% 9.2 GB/s
Latency 67.2
60% 67.2 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 29.4%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H67M Builds (Compare 169 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock H67M - $104

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $350
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback