Colorful Battle Axe C.B250M-HD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics58.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive41.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemColorful Battle Axe C.B250M-HD  (all builds)
MotherboardColorful Battle Axe C.B250M-HD
Memory5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170309
Uptime1.7 Days
Run DateDec 08 '18 at 05:12
Run Duration173 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 14%
Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G4560-$31
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
72.5% Very good
Memory 91.8
1-Core 98.9
2-Core 172
72% 121 Pts
4-Core 311
8-Core 305
41% 308 Pts
64-Core 310
19% 310 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 72.5%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75
CLim: 1360 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 18.9.3
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
58.9% Above average
Lighting 75.8
Reflection 70.3
Parallax 87.7
62% 77.9 fps
MRender 70.7
Gravity 70.4
Splatting 57.5
53% 66.2 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 53%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Bulldozer 120G 120GB
38GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P0921A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 158 161 154 133 116 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
41.2% Average
Read 379
Write 161
Mixed 160
SusWrite 145
47% 211 MB/s
4K Read 18
4K Write 16.6
4K Mixed 9.8
49% 14.8 MB/s
DQ Read 107
DQ Write 16.5
DQ Mixed 25
28% 49.4 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 41.2%
Great: 89%
Seagate ST_M13FQBL 3TB
1TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 111 109 112 113 111 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 119
Write 80.4
Mixed 77.1
SusWrite 111
71% 96.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
185% 1.33 MB/s
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60
730GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 112 113 116 116 116 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
70.8% Very good
Read 132
Write 119
Mixed 72.7
SusWrite 114
80% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.9
177% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 70.8%
Great: 83%
Hitachi HUA722020ALA330 2TB
472GB free
Firmware: JKAOA34E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 90 92 93 92 93 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
50.1% Above average
Read 82.7
Write 81.7
Mixed 44
SusWrite 91.9
55% 75.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
143% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 70%
Sony Storage Media 4GB
0GB free, PID 02a5
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.7 3.9 4.2 3.9 4 3.9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
3.49% Terrible
Read 11.7
Write 3.2
Mixed 4.7
SusWrite 3.9
7% 5.87 MB/s
4K Read 4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
15% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.49%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
43.8% Average
MC Read 16.2
MC Write 15.5
MC Mixed 12.1
42% 14.6 GB/s
SC Read 12.4
SC Write 15.1
SC Mixed 12.1
38% 13.2 GB/s
Latency 64.4
62% 64.4 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Battle Axe C.B250M-HD Builds (Compare 27 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

System: Colorful Battle Axe C.B250M-HD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 104% - Outstanding Total price: $129
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback