Performance Results


Gaming 46% Yacht	Desktop 93% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 40% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (90th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 10 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	46.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	121% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP Pavilion Gaming Laptop 15-cx0xxx (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 8478
Memory	12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181011
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 07 '18 at 17:22
Run Duration	124 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	13%

PC Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8750H 442,631 User benchmarks, average bench 70% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	86.6% Excellent	Memory 94.9 1-Core 126 2-Core 257 89% 159 Pts	4-Core 426 8-Core 594 64% 510 Pts	64-Core 682 42% 682 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 86.6% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile Max-Q) 36,643 User benchmarks, average bench 43% HP(103C 8478) 3GB CLim: 1670 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 398.36 Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	46.3% Average	Lighting 54.3 Reflection 66.7 Parallax 57.7 44% 59.6 fps	MRender 69.8 Gravity 53.3 Splatting 62 50% 61.7 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 46.3% Great: 48%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Liteon CA3-8D128-HP 128GB 3,206 User benchmarks, average bench 107% 71GB free (System drive) Firmware: A381 SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 122 115 120 122 119 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	121% Outstanding	Read 1067 Write 402 Mixed 469 SusWrite 118 113% 514 MB/s	4K Read 48.5 4K Write 100 4K Mixed 53.4 195% 67.4 MB/s	DQ Read 371 DQ Write 146 DQ Mixed 168 148% 228 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 121% Great: 137%
Toshiba MQ04ABD200 2TB 1,687 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 2TB free Firmware: JT000C SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 137 136 138 138 136 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	77.8% Very good	Read 133 Write 126 Mixed 50.7 SusWrite 137 81% 112 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 4.8 4K Mixed 0.5 194% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 77.8% Great: 80%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD 2x8GB 43,895 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	84.6% Excellent	MC Read 32.6 MC Write 32.1 MC Mixed 23.5 84% 29.4 GB/s	SC Read 19.3 SC Write 35.9 SC Mixed 27.6 79% 27.6 GB/s	Latency 57.5 70% 57.5 ns
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 84.6% Great: 85%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 66%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	2,155x
GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 29%, 105,856 samples	955x
GTX 1050 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 23%, 160,694 samples	750x

SSD
MZVLB256HAHQ-000H1 256GBSamsungBench 174%, 20,171 samples	344x
PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBSamsungBench 177%, 99,566 samples	228x
PC SN520 SDAPNUW-128G-1006 128GBWDCBench 121%, 4,055 samples	178x

RAM
M471A5244CB0-CTD 2x4GBSamsungBench 60%, 54,777 samples	630x
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 76%, 108,106 samples	306x
4ATF51264HZ-2G6E1 2x4GBMicronBench 59%, 11,378 samples	282x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16