PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
Graphics | 2.23% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
System | HP EliteBook 8530w (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 30E7 |
Memory | 3.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20111208 |
Uptime | 1.1 Days |
Run Date | Dec 07 '18 at 16:57 |
Run Duration | 178 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 19% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core2 Duo T9550-$199
Intel(R) Genuine processor, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz
|
35.6%
Below average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia Quadro FX 770M
HP(103C 30E7) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 341.44
|
2.23%
Terrible
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
HGST Travelstar 7K750 2.5" 500GB-$59
128GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JF3OA0E0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 27 23 52 47 48 MB/s
|
25.5%
Poor
|
|||
ADATA CH11 1TB
124GB free, PID a11a
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5 6.6 6.8 22 21 23 MB/s
|
9.88%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR2
|
11.9%
Very poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core2 Duo T9600Intel $170Bench 39%, 2,726 samples | 16x |
Core2 Duo T9400Intel $55Bench 39%, 3,295 samples | 10x |
Core2 Extreme Q9300Intel $172Bench 46%, 660 samples | 6x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Quadro FX 770MNvidiaBench 2%, 849 samples | 44x |
Mobility Radeon HD 3650ATIBench 2%, 3,003 samples | 4x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 39% - Below average | Total price: $222 |