Asus ROG RAMPAGE VI EXTREME

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics34.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive344% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG RAMPAGE VI EXTREME  (all builds)
Memory57.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180803
Uptime1.5 Days
Run DateDec 07 '18 at 16:30
Run Duration265 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-7960X-$347
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
88.5% Excellent
Memory 83.2
1-Core 125
2-Core 251
84% 153 Pts
4-Core 502
8-Core 1,017
89% 759 Pts
64-Core 2,791
173% 2,791 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 88.5%
Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
Nvidia(10DE 12A4) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 411.70
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
34.6% Below average
Lighting 38.6
Reflection 45.9
Parallax 37.2
32% 40.6 fps
MRender 56.8
Gravity 39.8
Splatting 51.9
41% 49.5 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 34.6%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$320
809GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2101 2132 2169 2153 2162 2180 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
344% Outstanding
Read 2372
Write 2,147
Mixed 1,449
SusWrite 2,150
456% 2,029 MB/s
4K Read 55.8
4K Write 148
4K Mixed 76.7
261% 93.5 MB/s
DQ Read 933
DQ Write 738
DQ Mixed 857
636% 843 MB/s
Poor: 215%
This bench: 344%
Great: 425%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
797GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 448 448 449 449 449 449 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
124% Outstanding
Read 495
Write 479
Mixed 447
SusWrite 449
105% 467 MB/s
4K Read 42.4
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 58
195% 68.9 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 358
270% 362 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 124%
Great: 133%
Samsung 860 Evo 4TB-$380
2.5TB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 448 448 449 449 449 449 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
123% Outstanding
Read 497
Write 481
Mixed 454
SusWrite 449
106% 470 MB/s
4K Read 41.2
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 57.4
192% 68.1 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 338
DQ Mixed 358
270% 361 MB/s
Poor: 85%
This bench: 123%
Great: 133%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
477GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 448 448 449 448 449 449 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
125% Outstanding
Read 503
Write 474
Mixed 450
SusWrite 449
106% 469 MB/s
4K Read 41.2
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 59.1
195% 69.2 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 339
DQ Mixed 357
269% 360 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 125%
Great: 133%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
892GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 448 448 449 449 449 449 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
124% Outstanding
Read 500
Write 478
Mixed 459
SusWrite 449
106% 471 MB/s
4K Read 41
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 59.1
193% 68.3 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 339
DQ Mixed 358
270% 361 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 124%
Great: 133%
WD My Passport 25EA 2TB
1TB free, PID 25ea
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 36 37 37 37 37 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
19% Very poor
Read 35.3
Write 32.7
Mixed 26.5
SusWrite 36.5
44% 32.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
94% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 19%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Dominator DDR4 4000 C19 8x8GB
8 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 4000 MHz
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
145% Outstanding
MC Read 52.6
MC Write 77.6
MC Mixed 48.6
170% 59.6 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 23.8
SC Mixed 10.5
40% 14.1 GB/s
Latency 74.8
54% 74.8 ns
Poor: 87%
This bench: 145%
Great: 159%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG RAMPAGE VI EXTREME Builds (Compare 840 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 105%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 112%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG RAMPAGE VI EXTREME

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $1,256
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback