Asus P8P67 REV 3.1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics62% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (60%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P8P67 REV 3.1  (all builds)
Memory4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20121101
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 07 '18 at 04:14
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User IRN-User
Background CPU 60%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2400-$250
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
66.3% Good
Memory 91.1
1-Core 84.3
2-Core 160
68% 112 Pts
4-Core 234
8-Core 282
33% 258 Pts
64-Core 320
20% 320 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 416.34
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
62% Good
Lighting 77.6
Reflection 78.5
Parallax 75.8
63% 77.3 fps
MRender 70.8
Gravity 72.1
Splatting 74.3
60% 72.4 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 62%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
1GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 378
Write 379
Mixed 338
82% 365 MB/s
4K Read 26.6
4K Write 56.1
4K Mixed 33.6
113% 38.8 MB/s
DQ Read 302
DQ Write 301
DQ Mixed 296
224% 300 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
Maxtor 6L300S0 300GB-$45
15GB free
Firmware: BACE1G20
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 56 56 56 57 57 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
33.4% Below average
Read 58.5
Write 62
Mixed 36.8
SusWrite 56.5
39% 53.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 0.2
142% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 33.4%
Great: 36%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
36GB free
Firmware: 51.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 36 21 27 38 26 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
23.9% Poor
Read 50
Write 65.3
Mixed 27.8
SusWrite 33.3
32% 44.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.3
54% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 23.9%
Great: 59%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$50
21GB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 41 7.6 3.7 12 8.6 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
25.9% Poor
Read 64
Write 94
Mixed 72
SusWrite 25.9
48% 64 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 25.9%
Great: 84%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMX4GX3M2A1600C9 029E CMX4GX3M1A1600C9 029E CMX4GX3M2A1600C9 8GB
1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
2048, 4096, 2048 MB
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
42.4% Average
MC Read 13.4
MC Write 15.6
MC Mixed 13.9
41% 14.3 GB/s
SC Read 10.9
SC Write 13.3
SC Mixed 11.4
34% 11.9 GB/s
Latency 65.5
61% 65.5 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 42.4%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8P67 REV 3.1 Builds (Compare 554 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8P67 REV 3.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $546
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback