Performance Results


Gaming 13% Tree trunk	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	2.86% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	92% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v2-$635 10,921 User benchmarks, average bench 76% CPU0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	79.5% Very good	Memory 90.4 1-Core 96 2-Core 193 74% 127 Pts	4-Core 370 8-Core 603 60% 486 Pts	64-Core 751 46% 751 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 79.5% Great: 85%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K600 8,087 User benchmarks, average bench 3% HP(103C 094B) 1GB CLim: 875 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 411.95 Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	2.86% Terrible	Lighting 2.3 Reflection 4 Parallax 4.5 2% 3.6 fps	MRender 5.05 Gravity 4.9 Splatting 7 5% 5.65 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 2.86% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
MZ7KM1T9HMJP0D3 2TB 31 User benchmarks, average bench 109% 1.5TB free (System drive) Firmware: GD53 SusWrite @10s intervals: 449 442 441 445 440 429 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	92% Outstanding	Read 443 Write 438 Mixed 382 SusWrite 441 96% 426 MB/s	4K Read 21.8 4K Write 57.9 4K Mixed 29.4 101% 36.4 MB/s	DQ Read 380 DQ Write 339 DQ Mixed 356 268% 358 MB/s
Poor: 92% ↑ This bench: 92% Great: 123%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT42GR7AFR4C-RD Micron 36JSF2G72PZ-1G9E1 Micron 36JSF2G72PZ-1G9E1 Micron 36JSF2G72PZ-1G9E1 Micron 36JSF2G72PZ-1G9E1 Micron 36JSF2G72PZ-1G9E1 Micron 36JSF2G72PZ-1G9E1 Micron 36JSF2G72PZ-1G9E1 128GB 1866, 1866, 1866, 1866, 1866, 1866, 1866, 1866 MHz 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	109% Outstanding	MC Read 46.3 MC Write 42.5 MC Mixed 41.6 124% 43.5 GB/s	SC Read 16 SC Write 13 SC Mixed 13.1 40% 14 GB/s	Latency 66.7 60% 66.7 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 12%

Tree trunk

Desktop 67%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 11%

Tree trunk

GPU
Quadro K2000NvidiaBench 7%, 13,526 samples	498x
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples	307x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	263x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	185x
C400 RealSSD 256GBMicronBench 55%, 11,652 samples	129x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	113x

RAM
M391B5273DH0-CK0 4x4GBSamsungBench 72%, 618 samples	65x
M391B5273DH0-CK0 8x4GBSamsungBench 89%, 244 samples	58x
HMT41GU7AFR8C-RD 4x8GBHynixBench 89%, 207 samples	56x

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $373