Asus P8P67

Performance Results


Gaming 17% Surfboard	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 14% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	15.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	37% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P8P67 (all builds)
Memory	17 GB free of 20 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110302
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Dec 03 '18 at 17:47
Run Duration	136 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	27%

PC Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2500 82,538 User benchmarks, average bench 63% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	74.2% Very good	Memory 82.6 1-Core 42.7 2-Core 123 51% 82.8 Pts	4-Core 378 8-Core 394 51% 386 Pts	64-Core 369 23% 369 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 74.2% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 560-$180 23,273 User benchmarks, average bench 14% EVGA(3842 1463) 1GB CLim: 850 MHz, MLim: 1026 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	15.8% Very poor	Lighting 18.2 Reflection 20.8 Parallax 16.1 15% 18.4 fps	MRender 25.5 Gravity 18.3 Splatting 21.2 18% 21.7 fps
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 15.8% Great: 15%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Corsair Force 3 60GB 4,789 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 19GB free (System drive) Firmware: 5.02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 52 55 54 54 55 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	37% Below average	Read 160 Write 63.2 Mixed 88.5 SusWrite 54.2 20% 91.6 MB/s	4K Read 19.2 4K Write 34.9 4K Mixed 23.3 77% 25.8 MB/s	DQ Read 76.9 DQ Write 61.9 DQ Mixed 64.4 50% 67.7 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 37% Great: 52%
Samsung 840 250GB-$251 41,998 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 149GB free Firmware: DXT08B0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 202 232 237 240 244 243 MB/s Performing below potential (20^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	58.1% Above average	Read 244 Write 238 Mixed 145 SusWrite 233 48% 215 MB/s	4K Read 22.7 4K Write 44.4 4K Mixed 20.3 84% 29.1 MB/s	DQ Read 203 DQ Write 189 DQ Mixed 52 78% 148 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 58.1% Great: 85%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CML16GX3M2A1600C10 CMX4GX3M2A1600C9 CML16GX3M2A1600C10 CMX4GX3M2A1600C9 20GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 2048, 8192, 2048 MB Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	57.1% Above average	MC Read 19.4 MC Write 22.3 MC Mixed 18.5 57% 20.1 GB/s	SC Read 14.4 SC Write 17.9 SC Mixed 17.8 48% 16.7 GB/s	Latency 75.8 53% 75.8 ns
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 57.1% Great: 57%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8P67 Builds (Compare 1,494 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 36%

Jet ski

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 28%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8P67 - $120

CPU
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples	446x
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples	358x
Core i7-2600Intel $189Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	199x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	118x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	103x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	96x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	49x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $75Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	47x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	33x

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 34,385 samples	39x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	34x
XMS3 DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 4,223 samples	24x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 54% - Above average

Total price: $666

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16