bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics55.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive45.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
System
MotherboardIntel DP55KG
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110630
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateDec 02 '18 at 17:06
Run Duration211 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 22%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 860-$320
LGA 1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
71% Very good
Memory 91.4
1-Core 86
2-Core 162
68% 113 Pts
4-Core 282
8-Core 363
41% 322 Pts
64-Core 358
22% 358 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 71%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
PNY(196E 11D9) 3GB
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 416.81
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
55.8% Above average
Lighting 68.5
Reflection 67
Parallax 64.5
56% 66.7 fps
MRender 70.8
Gravity 67.2
Splatting 67.2
56% 68.4 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDBNCE0010PNC-WRSN 1TB
209GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X41110WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 193 197 197 197 206 196 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
45.7% Average
Read 209
Write 190
Mixed 147
SusWrite 198
42% 186 MB/s
4K Read 18.2
4K Write 33.5
4K Mixed 23
75% 24.9 MB/s
DQ Read 24.8
DQ Write 55
DQ Mixed 31.9
27% 37.2 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 45.7%
Great: 107%
Seagate ST380011A 80GB-$43
74GB free
Firmware: 8.16
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 38 38 38 39 38 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
26.4% Poor
Read 53.7
Write 14.7
Mixed 36.5
SusWrite 38.1
27% 35.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
127% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 26.4%
Great: 30%
Maxtor 6L160P0 164GB-$55
152GB free
Firmware: BAH41E00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 38 38 38 39 38 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
28.5% Poor
Read 60.1
Write 65.9
Mixed 39.6
SusWrite 38.2
38% 51 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 0.4
127% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 28.5%
Great: 36%
Maxtor 6 B160P0 164GB
152GB free
Firmware: BAH4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 39 39 39 39 39 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
30.3% Below average
Read 66.1
Write 60.6
Mixed 39
SusWrite 38.5
38% 51 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 3.8
4K Mixed 0.4
140% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 30.3%
Great: 30%
WD WD1600BB-22GUC0 160GB
70GB free
Firmware: 15.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 38 39 39 39 39 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
24.5% Poor
Read 46.7
Write 46.4
Mixed 23.5
SusWrite 38.5
28% 38.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
123% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 24.5%
Great: 32%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$50
0GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 134
Write 74.8
Mixed 71.2
69% 93.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.9
176% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 40% Great: 84%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$39
0GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 163
Write 151
Mixed 76.1
96% 130 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.2
232% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 109%
Patriot Memory 8GB
3GB free, PID 3100
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.6 8 8.8 14 7.7 7.9 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
6.75% Terrible
Read 24.7
Write 6.3
Mixed 8.8
SusWrite 8.9
14% 12.2 MB/s
4K Read 3.9
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
21% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.75%
Great: 11%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 0x31364A54463531323634415A2D3147344D31 0x80CE 0x4D33373842353137334442302D434B302020 0x802C 0x31364A54463531323634415A2D3147344D31 0x80CE 0x4D33373842353137334442302D434B302020 16GB
1333, 1600, 1333, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
41.3% Average
MC Read 15.5
MC Write 13.1
MC Mixed 12.1
39% 13.6 GB/s
SC Read 12.9
SC Write 13
SC Mixed 12.4
36% 12.8 GB/s
Latency 65.1
61% 65.1 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 41.3%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,430 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback