MSI Z97 GAMING 3 (MS-7918)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive142% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory28GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 28GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMSI MS-7918
MotherboardMSI Z97 GAMING 3 (MS-7918)  (all builds)
Memory22.6 GB free of 28 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160216
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 01 '18 at 14:11
Run Duration197 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU 35%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4690K-$50
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
70.6% Very good
Memory 85.2
1-Core 108
2-Core 211
77% 135 Pts
4-Core 320
8-Core 356
44% 338 Pts
64-Core 386
24% 386 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 70.6%
Great: 82%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$104
62GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 366 310 286 256 228 208 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
142% Outstanding
Read 669
Write 576
Mixed 580
SusWrite 276
118% 525 MB/s
4K Read 52.7
4K Write 99.2
4K Mixed 63.4
214% 71.8 MB/s
DQ Read 780
DQ Write 653
DQ Mixed 941
644% 792 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 142%
Great: 280%
Toshiba THNSNK512GCS8 SATA 512GB
385GB free
Firmware: K8DC4101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 232 287 297 275 276 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
83% Excellent
Read 377
Write 364
Mixed 215
SusWrite 256
68% 303 MB/s
4K Read 21.7
4K Write 91.3
4K Mixed 33.3
124% 48.8 MB/s
DQ Read 354
DQ Write 287
DQ Mixed 184
175% 275 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 83%
Great: 89%
OCZ Trion 150 480GB-$300
402GB free
Firmware: SAFZ12.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 240 241 164 260 259 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
87.7% Excellent
Read 446
Write 453
Mixed 355
SusWrite 223
83% 369 MB/s
4K Read 28.2
4K Write 80.6
4K Mixed 36.8
132% 48.5 MB/s
DQ Read 346
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 197
189% 296 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 87.7%
Great: 101%
Toshiba Q300 480GB-$152
446GB free
Firmware: 8101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 384 295 201 280 282 284 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
63.1% Good
Read 376
Write 383
Mixed 293
SusWrite 288
75% 335 MB/s
4K Read 18.5
4K Write 36.5
4K Mixed 23
77% 26 MB/s
DQ Read 153
DQ Write 141
DQ Mixed 125
100% 140 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 63.1%
Great: 99%
WD Blue 1TB (2010)-$70
740GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 117 114 117 117 116 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
65.6% Good
Read 112
Write 110
Mixed 79.3
SusWrite 116
77% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
172% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 65.6%
Great: 74%
WD Blue 1TB (2010)-$70
730GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 114 112 114 116 115 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
58.6% Above average
Read 89.7
Write 86
Mixed 63.8
SusWrite 114
65% 88.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
181% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 58.6%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX2400C11D3/8GX 0215 CMY16GX3M2A2400C11 D3ES12081XH12AA KHX2400C11D3/8GX 28GB
2400, 1600, 1600, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
50.5% Above average
MC Read 17.4
MC Write 18.6
MC Mixed 15.9
49% 17.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 18
SC Mixed 14.8
44% 15.3 GB/s
Latency 71.8
56% 71.8 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z97 GAMING 3 (MS-7918) Builds (Compare 2,599 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: MSI Z97 GAMING 3 (MS-7918) - $135

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $783
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback