DELL Studio XPS 435T/9000

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics73.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemDELL Studio XPS 435T/9000  (all builds)
MotherboardDELL 0X501H
Memory15.5 GB free of 20 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090319
Uptime1.8 Days
Run DateNov 29 '18 at 16:47
Run Duration177 Seconds
Run User IRL-User
Background CPU 11%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-950-$100
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
59.2% Above average
Memory 72.7
1-Core 80.4
2-Core 156
60% 103 Pts
4-Core 252
8-Core 336
37% 294 Pts
64-Core 320
20% 320 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 59.2%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 417.1
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
73.9% Very good
Lighting 86.8
Reflection 112
Parallax 106
71% 101 fps
MRender 95.3
Gravity 97.5
Splatting 99.2
80% 97.3 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Force 3 120GB-$109
54GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.3.2
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 149
Write 116
Mixed 132
29% 132 MB/s
4K Read 15
4K Write 29.7
4K Mixed 18.4
62% 21 MB/s
DQ Read 135
DQ Write 113
DQ Mixed 105
84% 118 MB/s
Poor: 32% Great: 61%
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$28
107GB free
Firmware: Z32080RL
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 217
Write 221
Mixed 208
48% 215 MB/s
4K Read 10.8
4K Write 33.4
4K Mixed 12
49% 18.7 MB/s
DQ Read 153
DQ Write 155
DQ Mixed 29.4
56% 112 MB/s
Poor: 35% Great: 86%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
240GB free
Firmware: CC49
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 96.7
Write 100
Mixed 60.2
64% 85.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
180% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 34% Great: 68%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
296GB free
Firmware: CC49
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 110
Write 99.7
Mixed 59.7
66% 89.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1
176% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 34% Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 20GB
null MHz
2048, 2048, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
37.8% Below average
MC Read 14.4
MC Write 12
MC Mixed 14
38% 13.5 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 8.6
SC Mixed 10.1
26% 9.17 GB/s
Latency 95.3
42% 95.3 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 37.8%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Studio XPS 435T/9000 Builds (Compare 457 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

System: DELL Studio XPS 435T/9000

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $177
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback