Lenovo 80E1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 21%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 24.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.46% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (49%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 80E1  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Lancer 4B2
Memory4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150821
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateJun 17 '16 at 04:34
Run Duration107 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 49%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-6410 APU R5 Graphics
Socket FT3b, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
24.5% Poor
Memory 43.5
1-Core 12.9
2-Core 20.5
20% 25.6 Pts
4-Core 32.2
8-Core 45.2
5% 38.7 Pts
64-Core 53.7
3% 53.7 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 24.5%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5
Legend(17AA 3804) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 16.150.2211.0
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
1.46% Terrible
Lighting 1.5
Reflection 3.54
Parallax 1.94
1% 2.33 fps
MRender 2.67
Gravity 1.17
Splatting 3
2% 2.28 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.46%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2013)
387GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 02.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
48.1% Average
Read 83.3
Write 84.1
Mixed 82.6
63% 83.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.51
4K Write 1.94
4K Mixed 0.23
82% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown RMT3170MN68F9F1600 RMT3160ED58E9W1600 8GB
800, 800 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
16.6% Very poor
MC Read 7.1
MC Write 4.3
MC Mixed 6.3
17% 5.9 GB/s
SC Read 3.6
SC Write 3.2
SC Mixed 3.8
10% 3.53 GB/s
Latency 187
21% 187 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 16.6%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 80E1 Builds (Compare 108 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 80E1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback