HP 800-089

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics9.61% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemHP 800-089  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2AF3
Memory8 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130906
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateNov 29 '18 at 06:34
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770K-$120
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
77.2% Very good
Memory 84.6
1-Core 116
2-Core 212
79% 138 Pts
4-Core 379
8-Core 529
57% 454 Pts
64-Core 583
36% 583 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 77.2%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 645
Device(1B0A 90CC) 2GB
CLim: 823 MHz, MLim: 1000 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 416.34
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
9.61% Terrible
Lighting 10.9
Reflection 10.8
Parallax 13.9
9% 11.9 fps
MRender 14.6
Gravity 14
Splatting 12.1
11% 13.6 fps
Poor: 9%
This bench: 9.61%
Great: 10%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial M550 256GB-$152
17GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU01
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 385
Write 385
Mixed 294
79% 354 MB/s
4K Read 25.8
4K Write 138
4K Mixed 40.1
163% 67.8 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 341
DQ Mixed 238
212% 322 MB/s
Poor: 60% Great: 113%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
164GB free
Firmware: HP34
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 129 130 128 128 129 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
81.9% Excellent
Read 157
Write 115
Mixed 79.3
SusWrite 129
88% 120 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 81.9%
Great: 114%
Generic- SD/MMC 64GB
56GB free, PID 6362
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 18 18 14 17 16 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
8.16% Terrible
Read 18
Write 7.7
Mixed 12.3
SusWrite 15.4
17% 13.4 MB/s
4K Read 2.8
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 1
61% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 8.16%
Great: 23%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B1G73QH0-CK0 Kingston HP698650-154-HYAG 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
49.5% Average
MC Read 17.4
MC Write 17.9
MC Mixed 15.1
48% 16.8 GB/s
SC Read 13.4
SC Write 18.4
SC Mixed 15.5
45% 15.8 GB/s
Latency 72.5
55% 72.5 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 800-089 Builds (Compare 22 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: HP 800-089

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $200
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback