Asus TUF Z270 MARK 2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (90th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 10 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics60.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive269% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF Z270 MARK 2  (all builds)
Memory13.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180314
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateNov 28 '18 at 13:45
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700-$167
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
88.4% Excellent
Memory 92.1
1-Core 123
2-Core 251
87% 155 Pts
4-Core 457
8-Core 710
72% 584 Pts
64-Core 714
44% 714 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 88.4%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Nvidia(10DE 1C03) ≥ 4GB; VGAPCX 6GB GeForce GTX1060 Palit Dual
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 397.64
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
60.4% Good
Lighting 75.9
Reflection 74.6
Parallax 72.1
62% 74.2 fps
MRender 70.9
Gravity 69.3
Splatting 70.7
58% 70.3 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 60.4%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB
87GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXZ7300Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1446 1448 1446 1458 747 453 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
269% Outstanding
Read 1,992
Write 1,358
Mixed 618
SusWrite 1,166
285% 1,284 MB/s
4K Read 54.2
4K Write 140
4K Mixed 67.9
243% 87.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1039
DQ Write 917
DQ Mixed 973
731% 976 MB/s
Poor: 134%
This bench: 269%
Great: 292%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
374GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 474 475 479 488 433 301 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
121% Outstanding
Read 480
Write 459
Mixed 405
SusWrite 442
101% 447 MB/s
4K Read 31.2
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 60.6
185% 68.4 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 360
271% 362 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 121%
Great: 129%
Intenso External USB-3.0 1TB
887GB free
Firmware: 1201
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 109 110 111 109 110 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
61.7% Good
Read 106
Write 107
Mixed 38.1
SusWrite 109
65% 89.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
106% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 61.7%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G4D240FSA.16FBD BLS8G4D240FSB.16FBD 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
85.5% Excellent
MC Read 31.4
MC Write 32.4
MC Mixed 27
86% 30.3 GB/s
SC Read 19.3
SC Write 33.7
SC Mixed 26.5
76% 26.5 GB/s
Latency 63.9
63% 63.9 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 85.5%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Z270 MARK 2 Builds (Compare 1,911 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z270 MARK 2 - $129

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $631
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback