Asus TUF Z270 MARK 2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 57%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 51%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics60.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive226% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF Z270 MARK 2  (all builds)
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180314
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateNov 27 '18 at 16:06
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700-$167
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
84.4% Excellent
Memory 92.7
1-Core 102
2-Core 261
84% 152 Pts
4-Core 410
8-Core 712
68% 561 Pts
64-Core 704
44% 704 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 84.4%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Nvidia(10DE 1C03) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 397.64
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
60.3% Good
Lighting 75.7
Reflection 75.2
Parallax 64.8
62% 71.9 fps
MRender 70.8
Gravity 69.1
Splatting 70.4
57% 70.1 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB
89GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXZ7300Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1328 1259 910 526 487 466 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
226% Outstanding
Read 1,524
Write 1,281
Mixed 581
SusWrite 829
235% 1,054 MB/s
4K Read 51.7
4K Write 135
4K Mixed 65.6
234% 84.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1004
DQ Write 893
DQ Mixed 932
704% 943 MB/s
Poor: 134%
This bench: 226%
Great: 292%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
374GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 468 475 477 487 424 298 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
127% Outstanding
Read 515
Write 478
Mixed 435
SusWrite 438
105% 466 MB/s
4K Read 43.9
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 59.4
203% 72.3 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 357
270% 362 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 127%
Great: 129%
Intenso External USB-3.0 1TB
887GB free
Firmware: 1201
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 109 110 110 110 110 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
61.5% Good
Read 105
Write 107
Mixed 38.1
SusWrite 110
65% 89.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
119% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 61.5%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G4D240FSA.16FBD BLS8G4D240FSB.16FBD 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
85% Excellent
MC Read 31.5
MC Write 32.2
MC Mixed 27
86% 30.2 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 32.6
SC Mixed 25.3
72% 25.4 GB/s
Latency 62.7
64% 62.7 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 85%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Z270 MARK 2 Builds (Compare 1,911 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z270 MARK 2 - $129

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $631
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback