Gigabyte GA-Z68P-DS3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics38.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive55.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z68P-DS3  (all builds)
Memory8.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120321
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 27 '18 at 19:41
Run Duration205 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU 22%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
Socket 1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
88% Excellent
Memory 94.6
1-Core 119
2-Core 222
84% 145 Pts
4-Core 471
8-Core 472
63% 472 Pts
64-Core 480
30% 480 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 88%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
Asus(1043 051D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1296 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 18.11.2
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
38.5% Below average
Lighting 43.3
Reflection 65.9
Parallax 59.6
35% 56.3 fps
MRender 66.1
Gravity 42.1
Splatting 55.9
45% 54.7 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 38.5%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
198GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1E1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 303 209 229 310 210 273 MB/s
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
55.3% Above average
Read 277
Write 112
Mixed 154
SusWrite 256
45% 200 MB/s
4K Read 25
4K Write 38.7
4K Mixed 22.6
87% 28.8 MB/s
DQ Read 39.9
DQ Write 43.2
DQ Mixed 39.1
30% 40.7 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 100%
Asmt 2115 32GB
30GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 95 96 92 100 96 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
28.6% Poor
Read 173
Write 104
Mixed 125
SusWrite 96.3
28% 125 MB/s
4K Read 17.9
4K Write 9.5
4K Mixed 11.4
47% 12.9 MB/s
DQ Read 65.2
DQ Write 9.4
DQ Mixed 13.3
16% 29.3 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 28.6%
Great: 43%
Seagate Barracuda Green 1.5TB-$130
59GB free
Firmware: CC4A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 62 64 63 65 65 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
35.8% Below average
Read 61
Write 62.9
Mixed 47.9
SusWrite 63.9
44% 58.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.5
89% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 35.8%
Great: 69%
Samsung Spinpoint T166 500GB-$40
28GB free
Firmware: CR100-12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 58 58 58 59 60 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
35.3% Below average
Read 64.4
Write 64.8
Mixed 43.5
SusWrite 58.6
43% 57.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.5
101% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 35.3%
Great: 44%
Hitachi HDT721010SLA360 1TB-$30
102GB free
Firmware: ST6OA31B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 64 64 64 64 65 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
39% Below average
Read 71.5
Write 70.2
Mixed 40.2
SusWrite 64.3
45% 61.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.9
147% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 39%
Great: 61%
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 16GB
14GB free, PID 5575
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7 7.3 7.5 7.5 7.5 7.4 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
11.7% Very poor
Read 22.4
Write 7.2
Mixed 7.7
SusWrite 7.3
13% 11.1 MB/s
4K Read 5.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 2.1
154% 3.23 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 11.7%
Great: 17%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 126GB
116GB free, PID 0749
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 17 16 15 18 22 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
11.6% Very poor
Read 47.1
Write 10
Mixed 8.9
SusWrite 17.1
22% 20.8 MB/s
4K Read 3
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.7
38% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 11.6%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 12GB
null MHz
4096, 4096, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
59.7% Above average
MC Read 20.4
MC Write 21.7
MC Mixed 18.6
58% 20.2 GB/s
SC Read 16.9
SC Write 20.1
SC Mixed 19.2
54% 18.7 GB/s
Latency 58.2
69% 58.2 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 59.7%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z68P-DS3 Builds (Compare 560 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z68P-DS3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $333
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback