Asus SABERTOOTH Z87

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive82.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (48%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus SABERTOOTH Z87  (all builds)
Memory13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131003
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 16 '16 at 04:31
Run Duration247 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 48%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770K-$120
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
73% Very good
Memory 82.6
1-Core 110
2-Core 211
76% 134 Pts
4-Core 342
8-Core 568
56% 455 Pts
64-Core 564
35% 564 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 73%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560
MSI(1462 3236) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.6839
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 110
Reflection 115
Parallax 114
90% 113 fps
Gravity 99.8
Splatting 84.2
80% 92 fps
Poor: 70% Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston HyperX 120GB
43GB free
Firmware: 320ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
67.7% Good
Read 509
Write 114
Mixed 201
60% 275 MB/s
4K Read 30.5
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 14.3
120% 49.9 MB/s
DQ Read 134
DQ Write 140
DQ Mixed 14.5
45% 96 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 67.7%
Great: 81%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$100
40GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
82.4% Excellent
Read 503
Write 345
Mixed 345
88% 397 MB/s
4K Read 41
4K Write 73.4
4K Mixed 23.6
131% 46 MB/s
DQ Read 42.8
DQ Write 77.7
DQ Mixed 20.5
27% 47 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 82.4%
Great: 118%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$54
1TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
80.7% Excellent
Read 123
Write 158
Mixed 139
105% 140 MB/s
4K Read 0.43
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 0.23
96% 1.15 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 80.7%
Great: 112%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$59
739GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
66.5% Good
Read 117
Write 115
Mixed 110
86% 114 MB/s
4K Read 0.56
4K Write 2.05
4K Mixed 0.28
92% 0.96 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 66.5%
Great: 83%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$55
620GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
29.4% Poor
Read 50.9
Write 51.2
Mixed 50.4
38% 50.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.65
4K Write 1.23
4K Mixed 0.25
78% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 29.4%
Great: 67%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$50
305GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
57.9% Above average
Read 94.9
Write 107
Mixed 129
84% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.49
4K Write 1.25
4K Mixed 0.19
65% 0.65 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 84%
WD VelociRaptor 300GB-$90
199GB free
Firmware: 04.04V01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
64% Good
Read 114
Write 108
Mixed 87.7
77% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.92
4K Write 1.57
4K Mixed 0.72
147% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 64%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
57.3% Above average
MC Read 21
MC Write 21.6
MC Mixed 18.5
58% 20.4 GB/s
SC Read 12.5
SC Write 18.1
SC Mixed 16.1
44% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 75.8
53% 75.8 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SABERTOOTH Z87 Builds (Compare 1,566 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus SABERTOOTH Z87 - $193

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $685
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback