Gigabyte GA-Z370N WIFI-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 106%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 64%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 108%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics56.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive126% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte Z370N WIFI
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z370N WIFI-CF  (all builds)
Memory28.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180918
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 27 '18 at 17:28
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$188
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Memory 97.4
1-Core 159
2-Core 318
105% 192 Pts
4-Core 636
8-Core 1,065
104% 850 Pts
64-Core 1,310
81% 1,310 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 108%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1366 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 18.11.2
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
56.6% Above average
Lighting 71.9
Reflection 71.7
Parallax 90.7
59% 78.1 fps
MRender 71.5
Gravity 68.8
Splatting 57
53% 65.8 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 1TB-$199
786GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 477 487 419 399 402 402 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
126% Outstanding
Read 505
Write 490
Mixed 382
SusWrite 431
102% 452 MB/s
4K Read 45.5
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 61
204% 71.1 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 345
DQ Mixed 259
223% 329 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 126%
Great: 126%
Apple HDD ST3000DM001 3TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: AP55
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 91 91 92 92 90 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
51.5% Above average
Read 88.5
Write 89.5
Mixed 63.8
SusWrite 91
61% 83.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
146% 1 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 113%
WDC WD32 00AAKS-75L9A0 320GB
298GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 104 104 103 103 103 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
44.8% Average
Read 99.5
Write 102
Mixed 67.5
SusWrite 103
126% 92.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.9
119% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 44.8%
Great: 45%
Generic- USB3.0 CRW -SD 16GB
14GB free, PID 0326
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 93.2
Write 68.3
Mixed 48.8
83% 70.1 MB/s
4K Read 9.5
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 4.6
294% 5.7 MB/s
Poor: 6% Great: 26%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB-$103
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
105% Outstanding
MC Read 39.4
MC Write 40
MC Mixed 31.3
105% 36.9 GB/s
SC Read 23.8
SC Write 44.2
SC Mixed 32.8
96% 33.6 GB/s
Latency 48.8
82% 48.8 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 105%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z370N WIFI-CF Builds (Compare 596 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z370N WIFI-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $342
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback