Asus Z97I-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics57.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive48.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsus Z97I-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory13.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140428
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 27 '18 at 11:34
Run Duration188 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770K-$120
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
76.5% Very good
Memory 91.4
1-Core 113
2-Core 217
81% 140 Pts
4-Core 347
8-Core 409
49% 378 Pts
64-Core 368
23% 368 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 76.5%
Great: 84%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
Asus(1043 8534) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5058
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
3.55% Terrible
Lighting 4.33
Reflection 7
Parallax 5.53
4% 5.62 fps
MRender 5.38
Gravity 1.43
Splatting 5.87
4% 4.23 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.55%
Great: 3%
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 417.1
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
57.3% Above average
Lighting 70.8
Reflection 73.9
Parallax 64
58% 69.6 fps
MRender 67.9
Gravity 68
Splatting 70.3
56% 68.8 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Drevo X1 SSD 60GB
33GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q0111A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 79 81 80 78 81 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
48.7% Average
Read 400
Write 72.8
Mixed 112
SusWrite 79.3
36% 166 MB/s
4K Read 20.4
4K Write 81.1
4K Mixed 9
85% 36.8 MB/s
DQ Read 85.2
DQ Write 81.9
DQ Mixed 52.4
48% 73.2 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 67%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$100
192GB free
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 398 274 272 273 273 273 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
118% Outstanding
Read 507
Write 474
Mixed 413
SusWrite 294
95% 422 MB/s
4K Read 45
4K Write 121
4K Mixed 58.7
208% 75 MB/s
DQ Read 373
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 230
208% 315 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 118%
Great: 118%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 1TB-$100
98GB free
Firmware: 1AA01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 53 54 55 56 57 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
40.6% Average
Read 85.9
Write 101
Mixed 62.1
SusWrite 55.1
56% 76.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
183% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 40.6%
Great: 62%
Hitachi Deskstar P7K500 500GB-$159
82GB free
Firmware: GM4OA52A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 63 62 64 64 64 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
37% Below average
Read 65.1
Write 67.4
Mixed 32.2
SusWrite 63.6
42% 57.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 37%
Great: 51%
WD Green 1.5TB (2009)-$150
276GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 62 62 63 63 64 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
44.1% Average
Read 90.9
Write 93.6
Mixed 64
SusWrite 62.4
57% 77.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
131% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 55%
Kingston DataTraveler 3.0 63GB
6GB free
Firmware: PMAP
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 94 87 90 91 79 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 16% Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance Pro DDR3 2133 C11 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (55th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
51.6% Above average
MC Read 18.2
MC Write 18.2
MC Mixed 15.8
50% 17.4 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 18.7
SC Mixed 16.5
47% 16.4 GB/s
Latency 65.1
61% 65.1 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z97I-PLUS Builds (Compare 584 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus Z97I-PLUS - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Good Total price: $663
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback