Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	52.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2400-$250 166,255 User benchmarks, average bench 61% SKTH, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	67.6% Good	Memory 84 1-Core 68.2 2-Core 168 62% 107 Pts	4-Core 298 8-Core 292 40% 295 Pts	64-Core 320 20% 320 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 67.6% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 390-$325 82,117 User benchmarks, average bench 50% Sapphire(174B E324) CLim: 1040 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 18.9.3 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	52.6% Above average	Lighting 65.3 Reflection 59.4 Parallax 78.2 53% 67.6 fps	MRender 57.2 Gravity 52.5 Splatting 74 51% 61.2 fps
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 52.6% Great: 52%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52 296,814 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 6GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT01B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 444 Write 446 Mixed 412 97% 434 MB/s	4K Read 30.5 4K Write 52.1 4K Mixed 36.8 121% 39.8 MB/s	DQ Read 386 DQ Write 343 DQ Mixed 359 271% 363 MB/s
Poor: 75% Great: 128%
WD Elements 25A2 1TB 31,808 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 90GB free, PID 25a2 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 25 25 24 24 24 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	15.3% Very poor	Read 29.7 Write 25 Mixed 20.5 SusWrite 24.4 33% 24.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.9 94% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 15.3% Great: 63%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Nanya NT4GC64B8HG0NF-CG Kingston 9905403-433.A00LF NT4GC64B8HG0NF-CG Kingston 9905403-433.A00LF 16GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance (0^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	48.9% Average	MC Read 16.6 MC Write 18.2 MC Mixed 15.9 48% 16.9 GB/s	SC Read 13.6 SC Write 14.5 SC Mixed 14.4 40% 14.2 GB/s	Latency 73.5 54% 73.5 ns
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 48.9% Great: 52%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16