ECS H81H3-A3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 88%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 68%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics115% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive96% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardECS H81H3-A3  (all builds)
Memory9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150414
Uptime4 Days
Run DateNov 27 '18 at 01:42
Run Duration173 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 15%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4590-$188
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
76.8% Very good
Memory 87.2
1-Core 104
2-Core 208
76% 133 Pts
4-Core 385
8-Core 382
52% 384 Pts
64-Core 376
23% 376 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 76.8%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 2113 MHz, MLim: 2727 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 416.34
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Lighting 152
Reflection 163
Parallax 150
124% 155 fps
MRender 127
Gravity 152
Splatting 120
108% 133 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 115%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Vector 180 240GB-$160
136GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 299 378 415 390 430 392 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
96% Outstanding
Read 401
Write 432
Mixed 321
SusWrite 384
87% 384 MB/s
4K Read 22.5
4K Write 97.8
4K Mixed 36.7
133% 52.3 MB/s
DQ Read 344
DQ Write 353
DQ Mixed 282
230% 326 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 96%
Great: 108%
Samsung MZ7PD256HCGM-000H7 256GB
68GB free
Firmware: DXM06H6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 301 419 421 427 412 423 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 455
Write 307
Mixed 302
SusWrite 400
82% 366 MB/s
4K Read 33.4
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 46.5
165% 61.1 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 264
DQ Mixed 170
168% 270 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 108%
Great: 108%
Hitachi HDS721010CLA632 1TB-$105
237GB free
Firmware: JP4OA41A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 81 84 83 81 84 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
42.3% Average
Read 65.1
Write 64.7
Mixed 39
SusWrite 82.1
46% 62.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
131% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 42.3%
Great: 76%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
322GB free
Firmware: MS2OA7C0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 106 123 131 126 129 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
80.8% Excellent
Read 160
Write 154
Mixed 32.1
SusWrite 122
84% 117 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
135% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 80.8%
Great: 107%
SAMSUNG HN-M101MBB 1TB
462GB free, PID 0237
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.7 63 79 79 79 79 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
33.6% Below average
Read 96.5
Write 36.2
Mixed 33.5
SusWrite 64.1
70% 57.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
90% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 33.6%
Great: 40%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
59.6% Above average
MC Read 21.5
MC Write 22.3
MC Mixed 19.6
60% 21.1 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 18.6
SC Mixed 13.9
46% 16.2 GB/s
Latency 70.3
57% 70.3 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H81H3-A3 Builds (Compare 32 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard

Motherboard: ECS H81H3-A3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 37% - Below average Total price: $409
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback